NBCM vs. IVEP
NBCM (Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy ETF) and IVEP (Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NBCM is a Commodities fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman, while IVEP is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure Index. NBCM is actively managed, while IVEP is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. NBCM charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for IVEP.
Performance
NBCM vs. IVEP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NBCM
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -2.98%
- YTD
- 28.62%
- 6M
- 28.05%
- 1Y
- 43.15%
- 3Y*
- 18.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVEP
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NBCM vs. IVEP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NBCM Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy ETF | 4.60% |
IVEP Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF | 8.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBCM and IVEP is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026 | -0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBCM vs. IVEP — Risk / Return Rank
NBCM
IVEP
NBCM vs. IVEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy ETF (NBCM) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF (IVEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NBCM | IVEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.47 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.96 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBCM | IVEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 2.63 | -1.71 |
Drawdowns
NBCM vs. IVEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBCM drawdown since its inception was -12.84%, which is greater than IVEP's maximum drawdown of -7.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBCM and IVEP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBCM | IVEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.84% | -7.34% | -5.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.39% | -3.18% | -2.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.18% | -2.00% | -2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | — | — |
Volatility
NBCM vs. IVEP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBCM | IVEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.03% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.49% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.43% | 25.95% | -8.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 25.95% | -11.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 25.95% | -11.01% |
NBCM vs. IVEP - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBCM has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than IVEP's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBCM vs. IVEP - Dividend Comparison
NBCM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, while IVEP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVEP Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NBCM Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy ETF | 6.57% | 8.46% | 5.22% | 4.37% | 0.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NBCM and IVEP have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NBCM is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NBCM is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVEP.
NBCM has the higher dividend yield at 6.57%, compared with 0.00% for IVEP.
NBCM is categorized as Commodities, while IVEP is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Neuberger Berman and Wedbush. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for NBCM and 0.75% for IVEP.
Find the right allocation for NBCM and IVEP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer