PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NAZ vs. MIY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NAZ vs. MIY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Arizona Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAZ) and BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund (MIY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAZ achieves a 5.59% return, which is significantly lower than MIY's 7.21% return. Over the past 10 years, NAZ has underperformed MIY with an annualized return of 1.35%, while MIY has yielded a comparatively higher 2.67% annualized return.


NAZ

1D
-0.08%
1M
-3.34%
6M
3.62%
YTD
5.59%
1Y
9.82%
3Y*
10.61%
5Y*
-0.25%
10Y*
1.35%
ALL TIME*
4.56%

MIY

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.05%
6M
3.39%
YTD
7.21%
1Y
16.86%
3Y*
8.73%
5Y*
-0.26%
10Y*
2.67%
ALL TIME*
4.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$895.54K$693.30K$727.08K
$426.19K$342.59K$280.69K

NAZ vs. MIY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NAZ
Nuveen Arizona Quality Municipal Income Fund
5.59%12.08%12.93%-0.48%-27.24%4.75%22.64%18.15%-12.52%5.81%
MIY
BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund
7.21%11.24%3.48%6.60%-24.10%10.04%7.27%19.51%-6.71%8.86%

Correlation

The correlation between NAZ and MIY is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 1994

0.24

The correlation between NAZ and MIY shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NAZ vs. MIY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NAZ
NAZ Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
NAZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
NAZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

MIY
MIY Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
MIY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIY Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
MIY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIY Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NAZ vs. MIY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Arizona Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAZ) and BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund (MIY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NAZMIYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.31

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

1.81

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.72

5.87

-1.15

NAZ vs. MIY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the MIY Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAZ and MIY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NAZ vs. MIY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAZ drawdown since its inception was -38.28%, smaller than the maximum MIY drawdown of -42.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAZ and MIY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NAZMIYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.28%

-42.19%

+3.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-10.08%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.76%

-12.46%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.28%

-34.43%

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.28%

-34.59%

-3.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.34%

-2.46%

-5.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.32%

-8.29%

-1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

3.10%

-0.59%

Volatility

NAZ vs. MIY - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Arizona Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAZ) has a higher volatility of 2.58% compared to BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund (MIY) at 2.26%. This indicates that NAZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NAZMIYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.58%

2.26%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.17%

9.81%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.99%

11.76%

+0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.72%

11.68%

+2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.94%

11.96%

+2.98%

NAZ vs. MIY - Expense Ratio Comparison

NAZ has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than MIY's 2.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

NAZ vs. MIY - Dividend Comparison

NAZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.50%, more than MIY's 5.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MIY
BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund
5.36%5.57%5.21%3.86%5.70%4.38%4.23%4.27%5.27%5.46%5.85%5.66%
NAZ
Nuveen Arizona Quality Municipal Income Fund
6.50%7.09%6.20%3.63%5.01%3.75%3.52%3.82%4.52%4.65%5.53%5.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


NAZ and MIY have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NAZ has higher volatility (2.58%) compared to MIY (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAZ dropped -38.28% vs MIY's -42.19%.

MIY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NAZ and MIY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer