NAUG vs. UAUG
NAUG (Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF) and UAUG (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - August) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. NAUG is actively managed, while UAUG is passively managed. Over the past year, NAUG returned 17.67% vs 15.35% for UAUG. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
NAUG vs. UAUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NAUG achieves a 6.71% return, which is significantly higher than UAUG's 4.95% return.
NAUG
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 6.71%
- 6M
- 7.26%
- 1Y
- 17.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UAUG
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 4.95%
- 6M
- 5.47%
- 1Y
- 15.35%
- 3Y*
- 14.66%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- —
NAUG vs. UAUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NAUG Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF | 6.71% | 14.81% | 7.13% |
UAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - August | 4.95% | 12.42% | 5.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between NAUG and UAUG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2024 | 0.91 |
The correlation between NAUG and UAUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NAUG vs. UAUG — Risk / Return Rank
NAUG
UAUG
NAUG vs. UAUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF (NAUG) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - August (UAUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NAUG | UAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.58 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 3.89 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.99 | 20.60 | -3.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NAUG | UAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 2.81 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.43 | 0.91 | +0.52 |
Drawdowns
NAUG vs. UAUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NAUG drawdown since its inception was -12.88%, smaller than the maximum UAUG drawdown of -13.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAUG and UAUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NAUG | UAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.88% | -13.91% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.10% | -3.96% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.20% | -2.36% | +1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 0.75% | +0.29% |
Volatility
NAUG vs. UAUG - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF (NAUG) has a higher volatility of 0.61% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - August (UAUG) at 0.55%. This indicates that NAUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UAUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NAUG | UAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.61% | 0.55% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.53% | 4.13% | +1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.35% | 5.49% | +1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.21% | 7.89% | +3.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.21% | 8.71% | +2.50% |
NAUG vs. UAUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NAUG and UAUG have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
NAUG vs. UAUG - Dividend Comparison
Neither NAUG nor UAUG has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAUG Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - August | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, NAUG and UAUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
NAUG has higher volatility (0.61%) compared to UAUG (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAUG dropped -12.88% vs UAUG's -13.91%.
On 1-year performance, NAUG leads with 17.67% vs 15.35% for UAUG. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NAUG has performed better with a 17.67% return vs 15.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NAUG and UAUG have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
NAUG and UAUG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
UAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NAUG and UAUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer