PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASWC.DE vs. NATO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ASWC.DE vs. NATO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR (ASWC.DE) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ASWC.DE vs. NATO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ASWC.DE
HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR
3.45%38.30%39.36%14.35%
NATO.L
HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating
3.70%36.45%40.70%14.43%
Different Trading Currencies

ASWC.DE is traded in EUR, while NATO.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NATO.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASWC.DE achieves a 3.45% return, which is significantly lower than NATO.L's 3.70% return.


ASWC.DE

1D
0.74%
1M
-2.24%
YTD
3.45%
6M
-2.14%
1Y
24.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NATO.L

1D
0.20%
1M
-2.42%
YTD
3.70%
6M
-2.08%
1Y
24.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ASWC.DE vs. NATO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ASWC.DE and NATO.L have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Return for Risk

ASWC.DE vs. NATO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASWC.DE
ASWC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
ASWC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASWC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASWC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ASWC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASWC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

NATO.L
NATO.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NATO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NATO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
NATO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
NATO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
NATO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASWC.DE vs. NATO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR (ASWC.DE) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASWC.DENATO.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.04

1.10

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.56

1.63

-0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.21

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

1.76

+0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.92

4.42

+0.49

ASWC.DE vs. NATO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASWC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the NATO.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASWC.DE and NATO.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASWC.DENATO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

1.10

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.84

1.26

+0.58

Correlation

The correlation between ASWC.DE and NATO.L is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ASWC.DE vs. NATO.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ASWC.DE nor NATO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ASWC.DE vs. NATO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASWC.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.58%, smaller than the maximum NATO.L drawdown of -21.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASWC.DE and NATO.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ASWC.DENATO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.58%

-21.84%

+9.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.58%

-12.79%

+0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.55%

-10.13%

+0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.25%

-2.44%

+0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.89%

4.67%

+0.22%

Volatility

ASWC.DE vs. NATO.L - Volatility Comparison

HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR (ASWC.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.92% compared to HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L) at 6.58%. This indicates that ASWC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NATO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ASWC.DENATO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.92%

6.58%

+1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.50%

15.38%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.63%

22.09%

+0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.92%

27.88%

-8.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.92%

27.88%

-8.96%