NATO vs. UFO
NATO (Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF) and UFO (Procure Space ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NATO is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the Solactive Transatlantic Aerospace and Defense Index, while UFO is a Global Equities fund tracking the S-Network Space Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NATO returned 13.50% vs 135.88% for UFO. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NATO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UFO.
Performance
NATO vs. UFO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NATO achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly lower than UFO's 49.39% return.
NATO
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- 1.39%
- 6M
- 7.82%
- 1Y
- 13.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UFO
- 1D
- -5.68%
- 1M
- 12.53%
- YTD
- 49.39%
- 6M
- 71.06%
- 1Y
- 135.88%
- 3Y*
- 46.01%
- 5Y*
- 15.60%
- 10Y*
- —
NATO vs. UFO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NATO Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF | 1.39% | 50.95% | 0.35% |
UFO Procure Space ETF | 49.39% | 67.36% | 23.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between NATO and UFO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2024 | 0.58 |
The correlation between NATO and UFO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NATO vs. UFO — Risk / Return Rank
NATO
UFO
NATO vs. UFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF (NATO) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NATO | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.48 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 6.23 | -5.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.19 | 20.29 | -18.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NATO | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 3.59 | -2.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.34 | 0.46 | +0.88 |
Drawdowns
NATO vs. UFO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NATO drawdown since its inception was -15.99%, smaller than the maximum UFO drawdown of -50.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NATO and UFO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NATO | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.99% | -50.33% | +34.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.99% | -21.95% | +5.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.30% | -14.84% | +2.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.71% | -21.82% | +18.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.17% | 6.72% | -0.55% |
Volatility
NATO vs. UFO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF (NATO) is 7.97%, while Procure Space ETF (UFO) has a volatility of 16.64%. This indicates that NATO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UFO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NATO | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.97% | 16.64% | -8.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.65% | 31.27% | -13.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.71% | 38.08% | -17.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.61% | 29.92% | -7.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.61% | 30.76% | -8.15% |
NATO vs. UFO - Expense Ratio Comparison
NATO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than UFO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NATO vs. UFO - Dividend Comparison
NATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, more than UFO's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NATO Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UFO Procure Space ETF | 0.29% | 0.46% | 1.98% | 1.90% | 3.19% | 1.00% | 1.07% | 0.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NATO and UFO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UFO has higher volatility (16.64%) compared to NATO (7.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NATO dropped -15.99% vs UFO's -50.33%.
On 1-year performance, UFO leads with 135.88% vs 13.50% for NATO. On fees, NATO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NATO has been the lower-risk option at 7.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, UFO has performed better with a 135.88% return vs 13.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NATO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UFO.
NATO has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.29% for UFO.
NATO is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while UFO is Global Equities. NATO tracks Solactive Transatlantic Aerospace and Defense Index, while UFO tracks S-Network Space Index. They also come from different issuers: Themes and ProcureAM. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NATO and 0.75% for UFO.
UFO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NATO and UFO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer