PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NATO.L vs. WDEF.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NATO.L vs. WDEF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L) and WisdomTree Europe Defence UCITS ETF - EUR Acc EUR (WDEF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NATO.L is traded in USD, while WDEF.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the WDEF.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NATO.L achieves a 13.05% return, which is significantly higher than WDEF.L's -0.33% return.


NATO.L

1D
-0.78%
1M
8.86%
YTD
13.05%
6M
17.53%
1Y
20.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WDEF.L

1D
-1.42%
1M
-3.75%
YTD
-0.33%
6M
4.68%
1Y
-3.11%
3Y*
12.95%
5Y*
4.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NATO.L vs. WDEF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NATO.L
HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating
13.05%54.83%31.99%16.64%
WDEF.L
WisdomTree Europe Defence UCITS ETF - EUR Acc EUR
-0.33%42.47%-8.04%4.05%

Correlation

The correlation between NATO.L and WDEF.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2023

0.57

The correlation between NATO.L and WDEF.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.69 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NATO.L vs. WDEF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NATO.L
NATO.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
NATO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NATO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
NATO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
NATO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
NATO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

WDEF.L
WDEF.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
WDEF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDEF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDEF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
WDEF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDEF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NATO.L vs. WDEF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L) and WisdomTree Europe Defence UCITS ETF - EUR Acc EUR (WDEF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NATO.LWDEF.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

-0.04

+1.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.53

0.52

+1.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.09

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

-0.11

+1.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.91

-0.32

+4.23

NATO.L vs. WDEF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NATO.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the WDEF.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NATO.L and WDEF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NATO.LWDEF.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

-0.04

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.46

0.34

+1.12

Drawdowns

NATO.L vs. WDEF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NATO.L drawdown since its inception was -21.84%, smaller than the maximum WDEF.L drawdown of -41.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NATO.L and WDEF.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NATO.LWDEF.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.84%

-41.69%

+19.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.79%

-26.82%

+14.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.14%

-16.16%

+14.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.63%

-11.68%

+9.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.25%

9.59%

-4.34%

Volatility

NATO.L vs. WDEF.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L) is 6.19%, while WisdomTree Europe Defence UCITS ETF - EUR Acc EUR (WDEF.L) has a volatility of 11.05%. This indicates that NATO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WDEF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NATO.LWDEF.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

11.05%

-4.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.99%

65.03%

-49.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.05%

74.48%

-54.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.57%

44.73%

-17.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.57%

43.58%

-16.01%

NATO.L vs. WDEF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

NATO.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than WDEF.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

NATO.L vs. WDEF.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither NATO.L nor WDEF.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NATO.L and WDEF.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WDEF.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WDEF.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NATO.L.

NATO.L tracks EQM Future of Defence Index, while WDEF.L tracks WisdomTree Europe Defence UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for NATO.L and 0.40% for WDEF.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NATO.L and WDEF.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer