PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NATO.L vs. VWCE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NATO.L vs. VWCE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWCE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NATO.L is traded in USD, while VWCE.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VWCE.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NATO.L having a 10.38% return and VWCE.DE slightly lower at 10.00%.


NATO.L

1D
0.00%
1M
5.24%
YTD
10.38%
6M
11.03%
1Y
17.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VWCE.DE

1D
1.71%
1M
0.81%
YTD
10.00%
6M
11.71%
1Y
25.62%
3Y*
19.75%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NATO.L vs. VWCE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NATO.L
HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating
10.38%54.83%31.99%16.64%
VWCE.DE
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
10.00%23.23%17.30%7.28%

Correlation

The correlation between NATO.L and VWCE.DE is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2023

0.62

The correlation between NATO.L and VWCE.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NATO.L vs. VWCE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NATO.L
NATO.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
NATO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NATO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
NATO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
NATO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
NATO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

VWCE.DE
VWCE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VWCE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWCE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWCE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
VWCE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWCE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NATO.L vs. VWCE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWCE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NATO.LVWCE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.36

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

2.86

-1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.23

11.93

-8.70

NATO.L vs. VWCE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NATO.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the VWCE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NATO.L and VWCE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NATO.L vs. VWCE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NATO.L drawdown since its inception was -12.87%, smaller than the maximum VWCE.DE drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NATO.L and VWCE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NATO.LVWCE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.87%

-33.91%

+21.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.79%

-8.91%

-3.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.45%

-2.01%

-2.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.59%

-5.43%

+2.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.31%

2.14%

+3.17%

Volatility

NATO.L vs. VWCE.DE - Volatility Comparison

HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L) has a higher volatility of 7.02% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWCE.DE) at 3.93%. This indicates that NATO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWCE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NATO.LVWCE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.02%

3.93%

+3.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.02%

9.70%

+6.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.17%

12.46%

+7.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.14%

15.33%

+3.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.14%

17.33%

+1.81%

NATO.L vs. VWCE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

NATO.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VWCE.DE's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

NATO.L vs. VWCE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither NATO.L nor VWCE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NATO.L and VWCE.DE have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VWCE.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VWCE.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NATO.L.

NATO.L is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while VWCE.DE is Global Equities. NATO.L tracks EQM Future of Defence Index, while VWCE.DE tracks FTSE All-World Index. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for NATO.L and 0.19% for VWCE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NATO.L and VWCE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer