PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NATO.L vs. 5MVL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NATO.L vs. 5MVL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (5MVL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NATO.L is traded in USD, while 5MVL.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 5MVL.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NATO.L achieves a 10.38% return, which is significantly lower than 5MVL.DE's 41.23% return.


NATO.L

1D
0.00%
1M
5.24%
YTD
10.38%
6M
11.03%
1Y
17.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

5MVL.DE

1D
3.29%
1M
3.27%
YTD
41.23%
6M
46.71%
1Y
74.34%
3Y*
35.51%
5Y*
15.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NATO.L vs. 5MVL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NATO.L
HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating
10.38%54.83%31.99%16.64%
5MVL.DE
iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)
41.23%43.66%14.08%8.67%

Correlation

The correlation between NATO.L and 5MVL.DE is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2023

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NATO.L vs. 5MVL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NATO.L
NATO.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
NATO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NATO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
NATO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
NATO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
NATO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

5MVL.DE
5MVL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
5MVL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5MVL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
5MVL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
5MVL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
5MVL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NATO.L vs. 5MVL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (5MVL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NATO.L5MVL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.59

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

6.48

-5.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.23

20.49

-17.26

NATO.L vs. 5MVL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NATO.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the 5MVL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NATO.L and 5MVL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NATO.L vs. 5MVL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NATO.L drawdown since its inception was -12.87%, smaller than the maximum 5MVL.DE drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NATO.L and 5MVL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NATO.L5MVL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.87%

-35.06%

+22.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.79%

-11.41%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.45%

-5.98%

+1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.59%

-10.10%

+7.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.31%

3.62%

+1.69%

Volatility

NATO.L vs. 5MVL.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L) is 7.02%, while iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (5MVL.DE) has a volatility of 9.66%. This indicates that NATO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 5MVL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NATO.L5MVL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.02%

9.66%

-2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.02%

18.27%

-2.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.17%

21.23%

-1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.14%

18.82%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.14%

20.64%

-1.50%

NATO.L vs. 5MVL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

NATO.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than 5MVL.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

NATO.L vs. 5MVL.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither NATO.L nor 5MVL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NATO.L and 5MVL.DE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 5MVL.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

5MVL.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NATO.L.

NATO.L is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while 5MVL.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. NATO.L tracks EQM Future of Defence Index, while 5MVL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Select Value Factor Focus. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for NATO.L and 0.40% for 5MVL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NATO.L and 5MVL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer