PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NASDX vs. VIGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NASDX vs. VIGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) and Vanguard Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VIGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NASDX achieves a 21.38% return, which is significantly higher than VIGIX's 10.83% return. Over the past 10 years, NASDX has outperformed VIGIX with an annualized return of 22.58%, while VIGIX has yielded a comparatively lower 18.40% annualized return.


NASDX

1D
0.47%
1M
10.94%
YTD
21.38%
6M
19.90%
1Y
42.08%
3Y*
32.65%
5Y*
20.44%
10Y*
22.58%

VIGIX

1D
-0.28%
1M
7.55%
YTD
10.83%
6M
10.12%
1Y
29.46%
3Y*
26.47%
5Y*
15.72%
10Y*
18.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NASDX vs. VIGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
21.38%21.00%36.91%54.69%-32.57%27.32%48.59%38.22%-1.21%31.27%
VIGIX
Vanguard Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
10.83%19.44%32.68%46.77%-33.13%27.27%40.19%37.26%-3.34%27.81%

Correlation

The correlation between NASDX and VIGIX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2000

0.94

The correlation between NASDX and VIGIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NASDX vs. VIGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NASDX
NASDX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NASDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
NASDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

VIGIX
VIGIX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
VIGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
VIGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NASDX vs. VIGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) and Vanguard Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VIGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NASDXVIGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.33

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

1.85

+1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.16

6.49

+7.67

NASDX vs. VIGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NASDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the VIGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NASDX and VIGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NASDXVIGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

1.92

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.71

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

0.86

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.47

-0.14

Drawdowns

NASDX vs. VIGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NASDX drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, which is greater than VIGIX's maximum drawdown of -56.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASDX and VIGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NASDXVIGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.16%

-56.95%

-26.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.90%

-16.51%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.71%

-23.03%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.33%

-35.62%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.33%

-35.62%

+0.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.28%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.37%

-16.28%

-18.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

4.68%

-1.62%

Volatility

NASDX vs. VIGIX - Volatility Comparison

Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to Vanguard Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VIGIX) at 3.62%. This indicates that NASDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NASDXVIGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.51%

3.62%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.19%

12.10%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.10%

15.87%

+0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.06%

22.35%

+0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.68%

21.59%

+1.09%

NASDX vs. VIGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NASDX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than VIGIX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

NASDX vs. VIGIX - Dividend Comparison

NASDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, more than VIGIX's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
2.98%3.76%16.95%7.61%3.75%2.59%1.28%7.09%2.47%1.65%0.75%0.85%
VIGIX
Vanguard Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.37%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.15%1.40%1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, NASDX and VIGIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NASDX has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to VIGIX (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NASDX dropped -83.16% vs VIGIX's -56.95%.

NASDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NASDX and VIGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer