PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NASDX vs. VCNIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NASDX vs. VCNIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) and VALIC Company I Nasdaq-100 Index Fund (VCNIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NASDX having a 21.38% return and VCNIX slightly higher at 21.53%. Over the past 10 years, NASDX has outperformed VCNIX with an annualized return of 22.58%, while VCNIX has yielded a comparatively lower 18.59% annualized return.


NASDX

1D
0.47%
1M
10.94%
YTD
21.38%
6M
19.90%
1Y
42.08%
3Y*
32.65%
5Y*
20.44%
10Y*
22.58%

VCNIX

1D
0.50%
1M
10.94%
YTD
21.53%
6M
19.86%
1Y
41.89%
3Y*
19.90%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
18.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NASDX vs. VCNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
21.38%21.00%36.91%54.69%-32.57%27.32%48.59%38.22%-1.21%31.27%
VCNIX
VALIC Company I Nasdaq-100 Index Fund
21.53%-2.43%25.36%54.21%-32.55%26.89%48.24%38.63%-4.76%32.35%

Correlation

The correlation between NASDX and VCNIX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2000

0.99

The correlation between NASDX and VCNIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NASDX vs. VCNIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NASDX
NASDX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NASDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
NASDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

VCNIX
VCNIX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VCNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VCNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NASDX vs. VCNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) and VALIC Company I Nasdaq-100 Index Fund (VCNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NASDXVCNIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.47

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

3.61

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.16

13.91

+0.26

NASDX vs. VCNIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NASDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the VCNIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NASDX and VCNIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NASDXVCNIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

2.78

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.54

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

0.79

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.27

+0.06

Drawdowns

NASDX vs. VCNIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NASDX drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, which is greater than VCNIX's maximum drawdown of -76.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASDX and VCNIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NASDXVCNIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.16%

-76.68%

-6.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.90%

-12.01%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.71%

-37.53%

+14.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.33%

-37.53%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.33%

-37.53%

+2.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.37%

-28.74%

-5.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

3.11%

-0.05%

Volatility

NASDX vs. VCNIX - Volatility Comparison

Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) and VALIC Company I Nasdaq-100 Index Fund (VCNIX) have volatilities of 4.51% and 4.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NASDXVCNIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.51%

4.51%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.19%

12.17%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.10%

15.64%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.06%

24.88%

-1.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.68%

23.74%

-1.06%

NASDX vs. VCNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NASDX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than VCNIX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

NASDX vs. VCNIX - Dividend Comparison

NASDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, less than VCNIX's 8.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
2.98%3.76%16.95%7.61%3.75%2.59%1.28%7.09%2.47%1.65%0.75%0.85%
VCNIX
VALIC Company I Nasdaq-100 Index Fund
8.34%0.00%3.76%10.90%13.50%7.28%2.40%1.57%0.55%4.57%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, NASDX and VCNIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VCNIX has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to NASDX (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NASDX dropped -83.16% vs VCNIX's -76.68%.

VCNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NASDX and VCNIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer