PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NASDX vs. FTQGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NASDX vs. FTQGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NASDX achieves a 20.21% return, which is significantly lower than FTQGX's 32.36% return. Over the past 10 years, NASDX has outperformed FTQGX with an annualized return of 23.09%, while FTQGX has yielded a comparatively lower 20.05% annualized return.


NASDX

1D
-0.16%
1M
3.00%
YTD
20.21%
6M
18.70%
1Y
39.39%
3Y*
31.17%
5Y*
18.92%
10Y*
23.09%

FTQGX

1D
0.22%
1M
9.32%
YTD
32.36%
6M
30.89%
1Y
55.95%
3Y*
31.26%
5Y*
16.84%
10Y*
20.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NASDX vs. FTQGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
20.21%21.00%36.91%54.69%-32.57%27.32%48.59%38.22%-1.21%31.27%
FTQGX
Fidelity Focused Stock Fund
32.36%13.65%36.95%28.94%-26.68%26.91%33.41%31.44%4.90%30.66%

Correlation

The correlation between NASDX and FTQGX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2000

0.88

The correlation between NASDX and FTQGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NASDX vs. FTQGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NASDX
NASDX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
NASDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
NASDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FTQGX
FTQGX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FTQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FTQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NASDX vs. FTQGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NASDXFTQGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.46

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

4.51

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.98

18.97

-5.99

NASDX vs. FTQGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NASDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the FTQGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NASDX and FTQGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NASDX vs. FTQGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NASDX drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, which is greater than FTQGX's maximum drawdown of -61.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASDX and FTQGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NASDXFTQGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.16%

-61.29%

-21.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.90%

-12.76%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.71%

-26.84%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.33%

-32.31%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.33%

-32.31%

-3.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

0.00%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.30%

-14.17%

-20.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

3.03%

+0.13%

Volatility

NASDX vs. FTQGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) is 8.36%, while Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX) has a volatility of 8.87%. This indicates that NASDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTQGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NASDXFTQGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.36%

8.87%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.19%

16.95%

-2.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.74%

21.35%

-3.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.29%

21.95%

+1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.81%

21.72%

+1.09%

NASDX vs. FTQGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NASDX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than FTQGX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

NASDX vs. FTQGX - Dividend Comparison

NASDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than FTQGX's 9.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTQGX
Fidelity Focused Stock Fund
9.40%12.44%9.94%0.61%7.96%13.53%11.41%5.07%14.71%5.89%1.08%5.91%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
3.01%3.76%16.95%7.61%3.75%2.59%1.28%7.09%2.47%1.65%0.75%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


NASDX and FTQGX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTQGX has higher volatility (8.87%) compared to NASDX (8.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NASDX dropped -83.16% vs FTQGX's -61.29%.

FTQGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NASDX and FTQGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer