NASD.L vs. SP5L.L
NASD.L (Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD) and SP5L.L (Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - NASD.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while SP5L.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NASD.L returned 17.79%/yr vs 13.92%/yr for SP5L.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NASD.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SP5L.L.
Performance
NASD.L vs. SP5L.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NASD.L is traded in USD, while SP5L.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SP5L.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NASD.L achieves a 19.73% return, which is significantly higher than SP5L.L's 10.35% return.
NASD.L
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 8.56%
- YTD
- 19.73%
- 6M
- 19.19%
- 1Y
- 40.49%
- 3Y*
- 28.20%
- 5Y*
- 17.79%
- 10Y*
- —
SP5L.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 10.35%
- 6M
- 11.35%
- 1Y
- 28.13%
- 3Y*
- 22.28%
- 5Y*
- 13.92%
- 10Y*
- —
NASD.L vs. SP5L.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NASD.L Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD | 19.73% | 19.87% | 26.82% | 56.40% | -33.39% | 28.25% | 48.47% | 38.09% | -8.81% |
SP5L.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc | 10.35% | 17.77% | 25.48% | 26.32% | -18.58% | 30.00% | 17.41% | 32.02% | -7.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between NASD.L and SP5L.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2018 | 0.86 |
The correlation between NASD.L and SP5L.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
NASD.L vs. SP5L.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NASD.L
SP5L.L
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
NASD.L
SP5L.L
Communication Services
NASD.L
SP5L.L
Consumer Cyclical
NASD.L
SP5L.L
Consumer Defensive
NASD.L
SP5L.L
Healthcare
NASD.L
SP5L.L
Industrials
NASD.L
SP5L.L
Utilities
NASD.L
SP5L.L
Basic Materials
NASD.L
SP5L.L
Energy
NASD.L
SP5L.L
Financial Services
NASD.L
SP5L.L
Real Estate
NASD.L
SP5L.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NASD.L vs. SP5L.L — Risk / Return Rank
NASD.L
SP5L.L
NASD.L vs. SP5L.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L) and Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NASD.L | SP5L.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.45 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.69 | 3.16 | +0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.29 | 13.78 | -0.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NASD.L | SP5L.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | 2.54 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.89 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.92 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
NASD.L vs. SP5L.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NASD.L drawdown since its inception was -35.01%, roughly equal to the maximum SP5L.L drawdown of -33.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASD.L and SP5L.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NASD.L | SP5L.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.01% | -33.49% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.93% | -8.86% | -2.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.36% | -19.21% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.01% | -25.08% | -9.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -0.54% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.28% | -4.77% | -2.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 2.04% | +1.00% |
Volatility
NASD.L vs. SP5L.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L) at 2.54%. This indicates that NASD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SP5L.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NASD.L | SP5L.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 2.54% | +2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.69% | 7.98% | +3.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.83% | 11.05% | +4.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.79% | 15.60% | +5.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.24% | 16.77% | +4.47% |
NASD.L vs. SP5L.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
NASD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SP5L.L's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
NASD.L vs. SP5L.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither NASD.L nor SP5L.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NASD.L Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.66% | 0.70% |
SP5L.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NASD.L and SP5L.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SP5L.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SP5L.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NASD.L.
NASD.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SP5L.L is S&P 500. NASD.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while SP5L.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NASD.L and 0.07% for SP5L.L.
Find the right allocation for NASD.L and SP5L.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer