PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
NASD.L vs. EQQQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

NASD.L vs. EQQQ.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NASD.L (Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD) and EQQQ.L (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, from Amundi and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NASD.L returned 17.79%/yr vs 17.62%/yr for EQQQ.L. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.30% expense ratio.

Performance

NASD.L vs. EQQQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NASD.L is traded in USD, while EQQQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EQQQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NASD.L having a 19.73% return and EQQQ.L slightly lower at 19.56%.

NASD.L

1D
-0.74%
1M
8.56%
YTD
19.73%
6M
19.19%
1Y
40.49%
3Y*
28.20%
5Y*
17.79%
10Y*
—

EQQQ.L

1D
-0.58%
1M
8.70%
YTD
19.56%
6M
19.25%
1Y
40.27%
3Y*
27.86%
5Y*
17.62%
10Y*
21.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NASD.L vs. EQQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NASD.L
Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD		19.73%19.87%26.82%56.40%-33.39%28.25%48.47%38.09%-8.81%
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF		19.56%19.96%26.41%55.59%-33.50%28.41%47.71%39.05%-8.88%

Correlation

The correlation between NASD.L and EQQQ.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2018

0.96

The correlation between NASD.L and EQQQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

NASD.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
NASD.L
EQQQ.L

Technology

53.7%
57.9%

Communication Services

15.8%
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
6.6%

Healthcare

4.2%
3.7%

Industrials

3.1%
2.8%

Utilities

1.4%
1.2%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.0%

Energy

0.6%
0.5%

Financial Services

0.2%
0.2%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.0%

Technology

NASD.L
53.7%
EQQQ.L
57.9%

Communication Services

NASD.L
15.8%
EQQQ.L
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

NASD.L
12.2%
EQQQ.L
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

NASD.L
7.7%
EQQQ.L
6.6%

Healthcare

NASD.L
4.2%
EQQQ.L
3.7%

Industrials

NASD.L
3.1%
EQQQ.L
2.8%

Utilities

NASD.L
1.4%
EQQQ.L
1.2%

Basic Materials

NASD.L
1.1%
EQQQ.L
1.0%

Energy

NASD.L
0.6%
EQQQ.L
0.5%

Financial Services

NASD.L
0.2%
EQQQ.L
0.2%

Real Estate

NASD.L
0.1%
EQQQ.L
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD

Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF

Often compared with NASD.L:
NASD.L vs. AAPLNASD.L vs. TSLANASD.L vs. AIAI.LNASD.L vs. MWRD.LNASD.L vs. SUSW.LNASD.L vs. METANASD.L vs. NVDA
Often compared with EQQQ.L:
EQQQ.L vs. QQQEQQQ.L vs. QQQMEQQQ.L vs. EQGB.LEQQQ.L vs. CNX1.LEQQQ.L vs. EQQU.LEQQQ.L vs. CSPX.LEQQQ.L vs. XNAQ.L

Return for Risk

NASD.L vs. EQQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
NASD.L
NASD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NASD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
NASD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L
EQQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NASD.L vs. EQQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

NASD.LEQQQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.55
2.61

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.50
3.59

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.44

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

3.64

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.29

13.38

-0.10

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NASD.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NASD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NASD.L and EQQQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

NASD.LEQQQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

2.61

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.86

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

1.08

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

0.81

+0.16

Drawdowns

NASD.L vs. EQQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NASD.L drawdown since its inception was -35.01%, smaller than the maximum EQQQ.L drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASD.L and EQQQ.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

NASD.LEQQQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.01%

-50.98%

+15.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.93%

-11.03%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.36%

-22.63%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.01%

-35.27%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-35.27%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.75%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.28%

-7.06%

-0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

3.00%

+0.04%

Volatility

NASD.L vs. EQQQ.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) at 4.34%. This indicates that NASD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

NASD.LEQQQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

4.34%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.69%

11.19%

+0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.83%

15.34%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.79%

20.50%

+0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.24%

19.85%

+1.39%

NASD.L vs. EQQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NASD.L and EQQQ.L have an expense ratio of 0.30%.

Dividends

NASD.L vs. EQQQ.L - Dividend Comparison

NASD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF		0.23%0.29%0.38%0.39%0.56%0.25%0.41%0.56%0.63%0.67%0.77%0.72%
NASD.L
Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.66%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.96, NASD.L and EQQQ.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NASD.L and EQQQ.L have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.

Both ETFs track NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NASD.L and EQQQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer