NAPR vs. BUFF
NAPR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April) and BUFF (Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NAPR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while BUFF is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NAPR returned 10.10%/yr vs 8.71%/yr for BUFF. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NAPR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for BUFF.
Performance
NAPR vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NAPR achieves a 10.51% return, which is significantly higher than BUFF's 5.42% return.
NAPR
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 10.51%
- 6M
- 11.15%
- 1Y
- 18.45%
- 3Y*
- 13.26%
- 5Y*
- 10.10%
- 10Y*
- —
BUFF
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 5.42%
- 6M
- 5.90%
- 1Y
- 14.36%
- 3Y*
- 12.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.71%
- 10Y*
- —
NAPR vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April | 10.51% | 6.56% | 13.29% | 30.60% | -12.13% | 9.09% | 15.90% |
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 5.42% | 11.02% | 12.05% | 16.51% | -4.44% | 8.37% | 44.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between NAPR and BUFF is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2020 | 0.76 |
The correlation between NAPR and BUFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
NAPR vs. BUFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NAPR
BUFF
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
NAPR
BUFF
Communication Services
NAPR
BUFF
Consumer Cyclical
NAPR
BUFF
Consumer Defensive
NAPR
BUFF
Healthcare
NAPR
BUFF
Industrials
NAPR
BUFF
Utilities
NAPR
BUFF
Basic Materials
NAPR
BUFF
Energy
NAPR
BUFF
Financial Services
NAPR
BUFF
Real Estate
NAPR
BUFF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NAPR vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank
NAPR
BUFF
NAPR vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NAPR | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.18 | 1.58 | +0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.95 | 4.02 | +10.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 84.84 | 21.50 | +63.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NAPR | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.78 | 2.80 | +1.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 1.04 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 0.49 | +0.58 |
Drawdowns
NAPR vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NAPR drawdown since its inception was -16.53%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAPR and BUFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NAPR | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.53% | -46.23% | +29.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.24% | -3.58% | +2.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.52% | -10.24% | -4.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.53% | -10.24% | -6.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.27% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.28% | -6.18% | +3.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.22% | 0.67% | -0.45% |
Volatility
NAPR vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) has a higher volatility of 1.10% compared to Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) at 1.02%. This indicates that NAPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NAPR | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 1.02% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.82% | 3.83% | -1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.89% | 5.15% | -1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.27% | 8.41% | +2.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.61% | 17.67% | -7.06% |
NAPR vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison
NAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
NAPR vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison
Neither NAPR nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.78% | 1.26% | 1.74% | 1.55% | 0.18% |
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NAPR and BUFF have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NAPR has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to BUFF (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAPR dropped -16.53% vs BUFF's -46.23%.
On 5-year performance, NAPR leads with 10.10% vs 8.71% for BUFF. On fees, NAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NAPR has performed better with a 10.10% return vs 8.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.
NAPR and BUFF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
NAPR is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while BUFF is Defined Outcome. NAPR tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while BUFF tracks Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NAPR and 0.89% for BUFF.
NAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.78 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NAPR and BUFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer