PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NAPR vs. BDRY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NAPR vs. BDRY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) and Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAPR achieves a 9.27% return, which is significantly lower than BDRY's 34.21% return.


NAPR

1D
-0.82%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
9.27%
6M
9.31%
1Y
16.17%
3Y*
12.30%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*

BDRY

1D
1.64%
1M
-7.14%
YTD
34.21%
6M
34.67%
1Y
103.63%
3Y*
24.09%
5Y*
-16.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAPR vs. BDRY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NAPR
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April
9.27%6.56%13.29%30.60%-12.13%9.09%14.67%
BDRY
Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF
34.21%44.24%-47.40%25.79%-68.84%282.99%20.50%

Correlation

The correlation between NAPR and BDRY is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2020

-0.00

The correlation between NAPR and BDRY shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NAPR vs. BDRY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAPR
NAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
NAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
NAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

BDRY
BDRY Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BDRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDRY Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BDRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDRY Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAPR vs. BDRY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) and Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NAPRBDRYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.89

1.36

+0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.08

4.82

+4.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

53.80

13.59

+40.21

NAPR vs. BDRY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAPR Sharpe Ratio is 3.76, which is higher than the BDRY Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAPR and BDRY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NAPR vs. BDRY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAPR drawdown since its inception was -16.53%, smaller than the maximum BDRY drawdown of -89.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAPR and BDRY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NAPRBDRYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.53%

-89.16%

+72.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.79%

-21.60%

+19.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

-69.71%

+55.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.53%

-89.16%

+72.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-71.65%

+70.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.26%

-58.43%

+56.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

7.65%

-7.35%

Volatility

NAPR vs. BDRY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) is 2.27%, while Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY) has a volatility of 7.30%. This indicates that NAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDRY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NAPRBDRYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.27%

7.30%

-5.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.55%

29.14%

-25.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.34%

42.10%

-37.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.31%

60.24%

-48.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.60%

62.40%

-51.80%

NAPR vs. BDRY - Expense Ratio Comparison

NAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BDRY's 3.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

NAPR vs. BDRY - Dividend Comparison

Neither NAPR nor BDRY has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NAPR and BDRY have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BDRY has higher volatility (7.30%) compared to NAPR (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAPR dropped -16.53% vs BDRY's -89.16%.

On 5-year performance, NAPR leads with 9.49% vs -16.41% for BDRY. On fees, NAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, NAPR has been the lower-risk option at 2.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NAPR has performed better with a 9.49% return vs -16.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 3.76% for BDRY.

NAPR and BDRY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

NAPR is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while BDRY is Commodities. NAPR tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while BDRY tracks Breakwave Dry Freight Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NAPR and 3.76% for BDRY.

NAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NAPR and BDRY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer