PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NAMFX vs. VIMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NAMFX vs. VIMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Intermediate Bond Fund (NAMFX) and Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund (VIMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAMFX achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly higher than VIMCX's -1.29% return. Over the past 10 years, NAMFX has underperformed VIMCX with an annualized return of 3.74%, while VIMCX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.41% annualized return.


NAMFX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.59%
6M
1.94%
1Y
7.38%
3Y*
6.46%
5Y*
2.50%
10Y*
3.74%

VIMCX

1D
-0.61%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
-1.29%
6M
-1.41%
1Y
-1.51%
3Y*
6.61%
5Y*
2.43%
10Y*
10.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAMFX vs. VIMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NAMFX
Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Intermediate Bond Fund
1.59%7.83%4.55%8.35%-9.55%0.98%5.92%11.34%-3.69%7.20%
VIMCX
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund
-1.29%0.72%5.20%22.64%-19.75%25.28%26.11%31.74%-4.18%24.95%

Correlation

The correlation between NAMFX and VIMCX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2009

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NAMFX vs. VIMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAMFX
NAMFX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
NAMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
NAMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VIMCX
VIMCX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
VIMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
VIMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAMFX vs. VIMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Intermediate Bond Fund (NAMFX) and Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund (VIMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NAMFXVIMCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.38

-0.08

+2.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.92

-0.01

+3.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.00

+0.52

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

-0.11

+3.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.40

-0.29

+13.69

NAMFX vs. VIMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAMFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the VIMCX Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAMFX and VIMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NAMFXVIMCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

-0.08

+2.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.14

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.56

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.41

0.71

+0.70

Drawdowns

NAMFX vs. VIMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAMFX drawdown since its inception was -26.56%, smaller than the maximum VIMCX drawdown of -33.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAMFX and VIMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NAMFXVIMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.56%

-33.92%

+7.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.57%

-12.14%

+9.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.66%

-20.32%

+16.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.48%

-28.42%

+14.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.16%

-33.92%

+16.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-7.73%

+7.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.53%

-4.88%

+2.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

4.53%

-3.95%

Volatility

NAMFX vs. VIMCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Intermediate Bond Fund (NAMFX) is 1.16%, while Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund (VIMCX) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that NAMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NAMFXVIMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

4.23%

-3.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.46%

12.04%

-9.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07%

15.71%

-12.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.78%

18.11%

-14.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.01%

18.70%

-14.69%

NAMFX vs. VIMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NAMFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than VIMCX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

NAMFX vs. VIMCX - Dividend Comparison

NAMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.26%, more than VIMCX's 4.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NAMFX
Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Intermediate Bond Fund
5.26%5.51%5.11%4.57%4.49%2.93%3.53%4.10%4.54%4.30%4.23%4.71%
VIMCX
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund
4.47%4.41%0.00%2.36%0.23%1.58%0.67%0.94%0.77%0.29%0.00%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


NAMFX and VIMCX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VIMCX has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to NAMFX (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAMFX dropped -26.56% vs VIMCX's -33.92%.

NAMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NAMFX and VIMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer