NAMFX vs. CRMVX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

NAMFX (Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Intermediate Bond Fund) and CRMVX (Potomac Managed Volatility Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, NAMFX returned 2.50%/yr vs 2.66%/yr for CRMVX. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NAMFX charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.62%/yr for CRMVX.

Performance

NAMFX vs. CRMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Intermediate Bond Fund (NAMFX) and Potomac Managed Volatility Fund (CRMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAMFX achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than CRMVX's 2.01% return.

NAMFX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: 1.59%
• 6M: 1.94%
• 1Y: 7.38%
• 3Y*: 6.46%
• 5Y*: 2.50%
• 10Y*: 3.74%

CRMVX

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: -0.00%
• YTD: 2.01%
• 6M: 2.34%
• 1Y: 8.54%
• 3Y*: 4.33%
• 5Y*: 2.66%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAMFX vs. CRMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
NAMFX Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Intermediate Bond Fund	1.59%	7.83%	4.55%	8.35%	-9.55%	0.98%	7.85%
CRMVX Potomac Managed Volatility Fund	2.01%	4.91%	1.22%	0.25%	4.76%	0.61%	3.98%

Correlation

The correlation between NAMFX and CRMVX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2020	0.33

The correlation between NAMFX and CRMVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.47 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NAMFX vs. CRMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAMFX

NAMFX Risk / Return Rank: 72
NAMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
NAMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
NAMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
NAMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
NAMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

CRMVX

CRMVX Risk / Return Rank: 69
CRMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
CRMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CRMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
CRMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
CRMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAMFX vs. CRMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Intermediate Bond Fund (NAMFX) and Potomac Managed Volatility Fund (CRMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NAMFX	CRMVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.38	2.15	+0.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.92	3.05	+0.87
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.43	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	5.34	-2.31
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.40	16.70	-3.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NAMFX vs. CRMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAMFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the CRMVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAMFX and CRMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NAMFX	CRMVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.38	2.15	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.00	+0.66
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.41	0.00	+1.41

Drawdowns

NAMFX vs. CRMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAMFX drawdown since its inception was -26.56%, smaller than the maximum CRMVX drawdown of -97.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAMFX and CRMVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NAMFX	CRMVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.56%	-97.39%	+70.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.57%	-1.62%	-0.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.66%	-97.39%	+93.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.48%	-97.39%	+83.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-97.10%	+96.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.53%	-24.20%	+21.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.58%	0.52%	+0.06%

Volatility

NAMFX vs. CRMVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Intermediate Bond Fund (NAMFX) is 1.16%, while Potomac Managed Volatility Fund (CRMVX) has a volatility of 1.28%. This indicates that NAMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NAMFX	CRMVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.16%	1.28%	-0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.46%	2.97%	-0.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.07%	4.05%	-0.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.78%	1,597.76%	-1,593.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.01%	1,469.00%	-1,464.99%

NAMFX vs. CRMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NAMFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CRMVX's 1.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

NAMFX vs. CRMVX - Dividend Comparison

NAMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.26%, less than CRMVX's 5.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRMVX Potomac Managed Volatility Fund	5.64%	5.75%	3.75%	2.74%	0.57%	2.59%	0.95%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NAMFX Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Intermediate Bond Fund	5.26%	5.51%	5.11%	4.57%	4.49%	2.93%	3.53%	4.10%	4.54%	4.30%	4.23%	4.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NAMFX and CRMVX in my portfolio?

NAMFX and CRMVX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NAMFX or CRMVX?

CRMVX has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to NAMFX (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAMFX dropped -26.56% vs CRMVX's -97.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NAMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.