PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NAMFX vs. AIO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NAMFX vs. AIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Intermediate Bond Fund (NAMFX) and Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund (AIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAMFX achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than AIO's 21.38% return.


NAMFX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.98%
6M
0.16%
YTD
0.81%
1Y
3.98%
3Y*
5.66%
5Y*
2.14%
10Y*
3.34%
ALL TIME*
6.28%

AIO

1D
0.64%
1M
-6.10%
6M
15.86%
YTD
21.38%
1Y
16.77%
3Y*
22.61%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.91M$1.86M$2.17M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NAMFX vs. AIO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NAMFX
Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Intermediate Bond Fund
0.81%7.83%4.55%8.35%-9.55%0.98%5.92%1.86%
AIO
Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund
21.38%0.48%54.48%19.27%-28.06%13.51%46.27%1.05%

Correlation

The correlation between NAMFX and AIO is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2019

0.34

The correlation between NAMFX and AIO shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (3 years) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NAMFX vs. AIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NAMFX
NAMFX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
NAMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
NAMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

AIO
AIO Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
AIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIO Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
AIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIO Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NAMFX vs. AIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Intermediate Bond Fund (NAMFX) and Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund (AIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NAMFXAIODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.14

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

1.16

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.87

3.45

+4.42

NAMFX vs. AIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAMFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the AIO Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAMFX and AIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NAMFX vs. AIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAMFX drawdown since its inception was -26.56%, smaller than the maximum AIO drawdown of -44.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAMFX and AIO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NAMFXAIODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.56%

-44.88%

+18.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.57%

-13.59%

+11.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.34%

-30.23%

+26.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.48%

-37.39%

+23.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-10.54%

+9.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

-10.81%

+8.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.61%

4.56%

-3.95%

Volatility

NAMFX vs. AIO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Intermediate Bond Fund (NAMFX) is 0.58%, while Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund (AIO) has a volatility of 7.09%. This indicates that NAMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NAMFXAIODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.58%

7.09%

-6.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.56%

15.75%

-13.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09%

19.98%

-16.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.80%

22.38%

-18.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.99%

26.85%

-22.86%

NAMFX vs. AIO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NAMFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than AIO's 1.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

NAMFX vs. AIO - Dividend Comparison

NAMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, less than AIO's 12.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIO
Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund
12.10%13.75%7.30%10.34%11.12%19.97%9.31%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NAMFX
Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Intermediate Bond Fund
4.83%5.51%5.11%4.57%4.49%2.93%3.53%4.10%4.54%4.30%4.23%4.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


NAMFX and AIO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIO has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to NAMFX (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAMFX dropped -26.56% vs AIO's -44.88%.

NAMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NAMFX and AIO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer