NAMAX vs. FTVNX
NAMAX (Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund) and FTVNX (Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, NAMAX returned 11.91%/yr vs 4.94%/yr for FTVNX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NAMAX charges 0.88%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for FTVNX.
Performance
NAMAX vs. FTVNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NAMAX achieves a 23.62% return, which is significantly higher than FTVNX's 6.40% return.
NAMAX
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 18.67%
- YTD
- 23.62%
- 1Y
- 33.94%
- 3Y*
- 18.24%
- 5Y*
- 11.91%
- 10Y*
- 11.28%
FTVNX
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 6.40%
- 1Y
- 0.72%
- 3Y*
- 7.64%
- 5Y*
- 4.94%
- 10Y*
- —
NAMAX vs. FTVNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAMAX Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund | 23.62% | 13.77% | 13.14% | 9.65% | -9.33% | 32.28% | 6.90% | 31.56% | -20.04% |
FTVNX Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Value Fund | 6.40% | -1.98% | 9.77% | 12.04% | -7.49% | 32.93% | 6.32% | 27.76% | -13.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between NAMAX and FTVNX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2018 | 0.91 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NAMAX and FTVNX has dropped to 0.68 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NAMAX vs. FTVNX — Risk / Return Rank
NAMAX
FTVNX
NAMAX vs. FTVNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund (NAMAX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Value Fund (FTVNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NAMAX | FTVNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.01 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.93 | -0.01 | +3.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.30 | -0.03 | +15.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NAMAX vs. FTVNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NAMAX drawdown since its inception was -60.44%, which is greater than FTVNX's maximum drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAMAX and FTVNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NAMAX | FTVNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.44% | -42.81% | -17.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.49% | -14.52% | +6.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.90% | -20.46% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.90% | -20.46% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -2.13% | +1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.47% | -6.31% | -2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 6.14% | -3.96% |
Volatility
NAMAX vs. FTVNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund (NAMAX) is 4.46%, while Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Value Fund (FTVNX) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that NAMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTVNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NAMAX | FTVNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.46% | 5.65% | -1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.87% | 12.05% | -1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.33% | 16.76% | -2.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 18.33% | -0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.99% | 21.60% | -1.61% |
NAMAX vs. FTVNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NAMAX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than FTVNX's 1.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
NAMAX vs. FTVNX - Dividend Comparison
NAMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.03%, more than FTVNX's 1.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTVNX Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Value Fund | 1.50% | 1.59% | 1.08% | 1.31% | 2.13% | 1.41% | 0.14% | 1.03% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NAMAX Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund | 6.03% | 6.71% | 7.07% | 0.74% | 6.39% | 8.99% | 3.22% | 3.38% | 27.38% | 21.08% | 8.07% | 17.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NAMAX and FTVNX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTVNX has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to NAMAX (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAMAX dropped -60.44% vs FTVNX's -42.81%.
NAMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NAMAX and FTVNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer