NAKA vs. MSTR

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

NAKA (Kindly MD, Inc) and MSTR (Strategy Inc) are both stocks. NAKA operates in Medical Care Facilities (Healthcare), while MSTR operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past year, NAKA returned -98.13% vs -74.56% for MSTR. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

NAKA vs. MSTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kindly MD, Inc (NAKA) and Strategy Inc (MSTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAKA achieves a -66.18% return, which is significantly lower than MSTR's -38.61% return.

NAKA

• 1D: -4.04%
• 1M: 23.06%
• 6M: -66.46%
• YTD: -66.18%
• 1Y: -98.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -80.29%

MSTR

• 1D: -4.56%
• 1M: -7.43%
• 6M: -37.69%
• YTD: -38.61%
• 1Y: -74.56%
• 3Y*: 28.96%
• 5Y*: 8.30%
• 10Y*: 18.75%
• ALL TIME*: 9.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MSTR Strategy Inc	$1.53B	$1.65B	$2.43B
NAKA Kindly MD, Inc	$927.52K	$999.60K	$1.48M

NAKA vs. MSTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NAKA Kindly MD, Inc	-66.18%	-71.69%	-69.00%
MSTR Strategy Inc	-38.61%	-47.53%	87.94%

Correlation

The correlation between NAKA and MSTR is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2024	0.25

Over the past year, NAKA and MSTR have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.25, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap NAKA : $82.66M MSTR : $30.86B
EPS NAKA : -$1.03 MSTR : -$97.96
PS Ratio NAKA : 340.73 MSTR : 59.67
PB Ratio NAKA : 8.24 MSTR : 1.95
Total Revenue (TTM) NAKA : $3.92M MSTR : $498.35M
Gross Profit (TTM) NAKA : -$7.39M MSTR : $336.89M
EBITDA (TTM) NAKA : -$169.03M MSTR : -$36.86B

Return for Risk

NAKA vs. MSTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NAKA

NAKA Risk / Return Rank: 9
NAKA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
NAKA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
NAKA Omega Ratio Rank: 3
NAKA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
NAKA Martin Ratio Rank: 20

MSTR

MSTR Risk / Return Rank: 5
MSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
MSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
MSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 5
MSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
MSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NAKA vs. MSTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kindly MD, Inc (NAKA) and Strategy Inc (MSTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NAKA	MSTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.57	-1.02	+0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.24	-2.18	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.74	0.78	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	-0.97	-0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.06	-1.38	+0.32

NAKA vs. MSTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAKA Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is higher than the MSTR Sharpe Ratio of -1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAKA and MSTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NAKA vs. MSTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAKA drawdown since its inception was -99.66%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTR drawdown of -99.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAKA and MSTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	NAKA	MSTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.66%	-99.86%	+0.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-99.44%	-79.53%	-19.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-82.63%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-84.11%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-89.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.53%	-80.31%	-19.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-72.71%	-86.42%	+13.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	92.55%	55.64%	+36.91%

Volatility

NAKA vs. MSTR - Volatility Comparison

Kindly MD, Inc (NAKA) has a higher volatility of 34.82% compared to Strategy Inc (MSTR) at 18.58%. This indicates that NAKA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NAKA	MSTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	34.82%	18.58%	+16.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	74.16%	60.57%	+13.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	172.15%	75.24%	+96.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	263.50%	89.94%	+173.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	263.50%	74.33%	+189.17%

Dividends

NAKA vs. MSTR - Dividend Comparison

Neither NAKA nor MSTR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NAKA and MSTR in my portfolio?

NAKA and MSTR have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NAKA or MSTR?

NAKA has higher volatility (34.82%) compared to MSTR (18.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAKA dropped -99.66% vs MSTR's -99.86%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NAKA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.57 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.