PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NAK vs. SAN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NAK vs. SAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) and Banco Santander, S.A. (SAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAK achieves a 13.20% return, which is significantly higher than SAN's 7.62% return. Over the past 10 years, NAK has outperformed SAN with an annualized return of 19.89%, while SAN has yielded a comparatively lower 15.12% annualized return.


NAK

1D
-0.89%
1M
6.70%
YTD
13.20%
6M
6.70%
1Y
85.83%
3Y*
116.42%
5Y*
31.01%
10Y*
19.89%

SAN

1D
2.55%
1M
4.97%
YTD
7.62%
6M
14.35%
1Y
62.51%
3Y*
59.80%
5Y*
28.69%
10Y*
15.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAK vs. SAN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NAK
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.
13.20%238.78%79.86%46.42%-32.31%1.30%-25.12%-24.46%-67.84%-14.49%
SAN
Banco Santander, S.A.
7.62%164.72%14.96%46.20%-6.62%10.41%-21.99%-2.32%-28.49%32.28%

Correlation

The correlation between NAK and SAN is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2003

0.21

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NAK:

$1.23B

SAN:

$183.03B

EPS

NAK:

-$0.19

SAN:

$1.06

PB Ratio

NAK:

69.19

SAN:

1.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

NAK:

$0.00

SAN:

$74.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NAK:

-$85.85K

SAN:

$46.97B

EBITDA (TTM)

NAK:

-$99.80M

SAN:

$21.14B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NAK vs. SAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAK
NAK Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
NAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAK Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
NAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAK Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

SAN
SAN Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
SAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAN Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAN Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAK vs. SAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) and Banco Santander, S.A. (SAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NAKSANDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.30

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

3.10

-1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.19

9.62

-7.43

NAK vs. SAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAK Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the SAN Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAK and SAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NAKSANDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

1.91

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.85

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

0.42

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.23

-0.24

Drawdowns

NAK vs. SAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAK drawdown since its inception was -99.01%, which is greater than SAN's maximum drawdown of -82.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAK and SAN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NAKSANDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.01%

-82.94%

-16.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.68%

-20.29%

-47.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.68%

-20.29%

-47.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.68%

-43.63%

-24.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.79%

-73.84%

-19.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.42%

-4.44%

-84.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.91%

-30.67%

-43.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.34%

6.52%

+32.82%

Volatility

NAK vs. SAN - Volatility Comparison

Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) has a higher volatility of 20.03% compared to Banco Santander, S.A. (SAN) at 9.50%. This indicates that NAK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NAKSANDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.03%

9.50%

+10.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

75.99%

26.74%

+49.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

114.61%

32.98%

+81.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

83.51%

33.77%

+49.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

97.81%

35.85%

+61.96%

Dividends

NAK vs. SAN - Dividend Comparison

NAK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NAK
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SAN
Banco Santander, S.A.
2.24%2.11%4.63%3.58%3.83%2.71%0.00%6.20%5.83%4.60%3.29%7.06%

Financials

NAK vs. SAN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. and Banco Santander, S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B202220232024202520260
31.44B
(NAK) Total Revenue
(SAN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NAK and SAN have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NAK has higher volatility (20.03%) compared to SAN (9.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAK dropped -99.01% vs SAN's -82.94%.

SAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NAK and SAN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer