NADA.DE vs. XMK9.DE
NADA.DE (Amundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Distributing) and XMK9.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged) are both Japan Equities funds - NADA.DE tracks the MSCI Japan Index while XMK9.DE tracks the MSCI Japan. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NADA.DE returned 10.47%/yr vs 19.23%/yr for XMK9.DE. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NADA.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for XMK9.DE.
Performance
NADA.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NADA.DE having a 19.90% return and XMK9.DE slightly higher at 20.50%.
NADA.DE
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 19.90%
- 6M
- 20.31%
- 1Y
- 38.41%
- 3Y*
- 17.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.47%
- 10Y*
- —
XMK9.DE
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- 20.50%
- 6M
- 20.57%
- 1Y
- 51.28%
- 3Y*
- 26.34%
- 5Y*
- 19.23%
- 10Y*
- 15.38%
NADA.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NADA.DE Amundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 19.90% | 12.75% | 13.65% | 16.45% | -12.50% | 9.86% | 9.71% |
XMK9.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged | 20.50% | 27.06% | 22.48% | 33.32% | -6.06% | 11.96% | 12.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between NADA.DE and XMK9.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2020 | 0.83 |
The correlation between NADA.DE and XMK9.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (5 years) to 0.93 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NADA.DE vs. XMK9.DE — Risk / Return Rank
NADA.DE
XMK9.DE
NADA.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (NADA.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged (XMK9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NADA.DE | XMK9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.46 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.83 | 5.25 | -1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.27 | 17.51 | -5.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NADA.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NADA.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.09%, smaller than the maximum XMK9.DE drawdown of -34.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NADA.DE and XMK9.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NADA.DE | XMK9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.09% | -34.30% | +15.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.99% | -9.73% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.93% | -21.74% | +4.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.09% | -21.74% | +2.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | -3.37% | +0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.59% | -7.64% | +2.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 2.92% | +0.20% |
Volatility
NADA.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (NADA.DE) is 6.21%, while Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged (XMK9.DE) has a volatility of 6.95%. This indicates that NADA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMK9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NADA.DE | XMK9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.21% | 6.95% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.74% | 15.92% | -0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.33% | 20.20% | -0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.75% | 18.84% | -2.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 18.60% | -2.22% |
NADA.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NADA.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XMK9.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
NADA.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Dividend Comparison
NADA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, while XMK9.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NADA.DE Amundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 1.59% | 1.90% | 1.93% | 1.75% | 2.64% | 1.95% | 0.60% |
XMK9.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, NADA.DE and XMK9.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, NADA.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NADA.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for XMK9.DE.
NADA.DE tracks MSCI Japan Index, while XMK9.DE tracks MSCI Japan. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for NADA.DE and 0.40% for XMK9.DE.
Find the right allocation for NADA.DE and XMK9.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer