NADA.DE vs. PR1J.DE
NADA.DE (Amundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Distributing) and PR1J.DE (Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D)) are both Japan Equities funds from Amundi - NADA.DE tracks the MSCI Japan Index while PR1J.DE tracks the Solactive GBS Japan Large & Mid Cap. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NADA.DE returned 10.47%/yr vs 10.33%/yr for PR1J.DE. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. NADA.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PR1J.DE.
Performance
NADA.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NADA.DE achieves a 19.90% return, which is significantly higher than PR1J.DE's 18.30% return.
NADA.DE
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 19.90%
- 6M
- 20.31%
- 1Y
- 38.41%
- 3Y*
- 17.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.47%
- 10Y*
- —
PR1J.DE
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- 18.30%
- 6M
- 18.60%
- 1Y
- 36.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.09%
- 5Y*
- 10.33%
- 10Y*
- —
NADA.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NADA.DE Amundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 19.90% | 12.75% | 13.65% | 16.45% | -12.50% | 9.86% | 9.71% |
PR1J.DE Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) | 18.30% | 12.92% | 13.38% | 16.35% | -11.58% | 10.23% | 10.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between NADA.DE and PR1J.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2020 | 0.99 |
The correlation between NADA.DE and PR1J.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NADA.DE vs. PR1J.DE — Risk / Return Rank
NADA.DE
PR1J.DE
NADA.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (NADA.DE) and Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1J.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NADA.DE | PR1J.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.35 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.83 | 3.49 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.27 | 11.31 | +0.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NADA.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NADA.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.09%, smaller than the maximum PR1J.DE drawdown of -99.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NADA.DE and PR1J.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NADA.DE | PR1J.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.09% | -99.34% | +80.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.99% | -10.29% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.93% | -16.25% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.09% | -18.66% | -0.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | -98.39% | +95.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.59% | -97.49% | +91.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 3.18% | -0.06% |
Volatility
NADA.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (NADA.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.21% compared to Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1J.DE) at 5.71%. This indicates that NADA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PR1J.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NADA.DE | PR1J.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.21% | 5.71% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.74% | 15.82% | -0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.33% | 19.51% | -0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.75% | 16.63% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 40.29% | -23.91% |
NADA.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NADA.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than PR1J.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NADA.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Dividend Comparison
NADA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than PR1J.DE's 1.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NADA.DE Amundi Core MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 1.59% | 1.90% | 1.93% | 1.75% | 2.64% | 1.95% | 0.60% | 0.00% |
PR1J.DE Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) | 1.48% | 1.75% | 1.91% | 1.90% | 2.21% | 1.80% | 1.73% | 1.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, NADA.DE and PR1J.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, PR1J.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PR1J.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for NADA.DE.
NADA.DE tracks MSCI Japan Index, while PR1J.DE tracks Solactive GBS Japan Large & Mid Cap. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for NADA.DE and 0.05% for PR1J.DE.
Find the right allocation for NADA.DE and PR1J.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer