PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NAC vs. NVHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NAC vs. NVHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAC) and Nuveen Short Duration High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NVHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAC achieves a 5.24% return, which is significantly higher than NVHIX's 1.93% return. Over the past 10 years, NAC has underperformed NVHIX with an annualized return of 2.33%, while NVHIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.23% annualized return.


NAC

1D
-0.50%
1M
2.23%
YTD
5.24%
6M
5.80%
1Y
19.13%
3Y*
11.56%
5Y*
0.54%
10Y*
2.33%

NVHIX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.91%
YTD
1.93%
6M
2.36%
1Y
4.91%
3Y*
4.36%
5Y*
2.09%
10Y*
3.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAC vs. NVHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NAC
Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund
5.24%13.09%8.67%4.47%-25.66%7.62%6.29%22.27%-6.23%6.79%
NVHIX
Nuveen Short Duration High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
1.93%2.43%6.88%3.54%-6.73%8.44%-0.10%8.27%3.47%8.17%

Correlation

The correlation between NAC and NVHIX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2013

0.24

The correlation between NAC and NVHIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NAC vs. NVHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAC
NAC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAC Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
NAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAC Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

NVHIX
NVHIX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
NVHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
NVHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAC vs. NVHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAC) and Nuveen Short Duration High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NVHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NACNVHIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.48

2.21

+0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.81

3.79

+0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.65

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

2.75

+1.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.36

6.95

+7.41

NAC vs. NVHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAC Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the NVHIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAC and NVHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NACNVHIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.21

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.63

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.93

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

1.12

-0.74

Drawdowns

NAC vs. NVHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAC drawdown since its inception was -46.41%, which is greater than NVHIX's maximum drawdown of -13.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAC and NVHIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NACNVHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.41%

-13.54%

-32.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.96%

-1.80%

-3.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.60%

-4.72%

-8.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.31%

-10.54%

-25.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.31%

-13.54%

-22.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

0.00%

-1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.41%

-2.04%

-6.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.34%

0.71%

+0.63%

Volatility

NAC vs. NVHIX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAC) has a higher volatility of 2.52% compared to Nuveen Short Duration High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NVHIX) at 0.68%. This indicates that NAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NACNVHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

0.68%

+1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.60%

1.55%

+4.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.75%

2.25%

+5.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.80%

3.33%

+7.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.24%

3.47%

+8.77%

NAC vs. NVHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NAC has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than NVHIX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

NAC vs. NVHIX - Dividend Comparison

NAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.32%, more than NVHIX's 4.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NAC
Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund
7.32%7.47%6.63%4.03%5.47%4.18%4.17%4.38%5.34%5.54%6.25%6.05%
NVHIX
Nuveen Short Duration High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
4.55%5.15%4.36%4.41%3.84%3.43%3.90%4.03%3.90%3.78%3.62%3.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


NAC and NVHIX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NAC has higher volatility (2.52%) compared to NVHIX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAC dropped -46.41% vs NVHIX's -13.54%.

NAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NAC and NVHIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer