PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NA.TO vs. VVL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NA.TO vs. VVL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in National Bank of Canada (NA.TO) and Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NA.TO achieves a 18.69% return, which is significantly higher than VVL.TO's 11.97% return.


NA.TO

1D
1.72%
1M
-0.50%
YTD
18.69%
6M
19.75%
1Y
56.06%
3Y*
33.37%
5Y*
21.58%
10Y*
21.05%

VVL.TO

1D
1.25%
1M
3.59%
YTD
11.97%
6M
12.15%
1Y
36.68%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
14.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NA.TO vs. VVL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NA.TO
National Bank of Canada
18.69%36.15%35.91%15.53%-1.45%39.02%4.01%34.04%-6.92%19.77%
VVL.TO
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD
11.97%21.53%14.96%16.51%0.45%29.74%-3.32%13.38%-9.42%12.32%

Correlation

The correlation between NA.TO and VVL.TO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2016

0.49

The correlation between NA.TO and VVL.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (3 years) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NA.TO vs. VVL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NA.TO
NA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
NA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
NA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
NA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
NA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

VVL.TO
VVL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
VVL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VVL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VVL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
VVL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VVL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NA.TO vs. VVL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for National Bank of Canada (NA.TO) and Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NA.TOVVL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.48

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.27

4.17

+2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.32

16.57

+4.75

NA.TO vs. VVL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.53, which is higher than the VVL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NA.TO and VVL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NA.TOVVL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.53

2.70

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.24

0.88

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.66

-0.07

Drawdowns

NA.TO vs. VVL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NA.TO drawdown since its inception was -58.47%, which is greater than VVL.TO's maximum drawdown of -43.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NA.TO and VVL.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NA.TOVVL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.47%

-43.93%

-14.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.99%

-8.83%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.58%

-18.10%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.58%

-18.10%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.66%

0.00%

-4.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.64%

-5.71%

-4.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

2.22%

+0.42%

Volatility

NA.TO vs. VVL.TO - Volatility Comparison

National Bank of Canada (NA.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.18% compared to Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO) at 3.23%. This indicates that NA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VVL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NA.TOVVL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.18%

3.23%

+2.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.83%

9.43%

+4.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.98%

13.70%

+2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.49%

16.03%

+1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.98%

18.74%

+2.24%

Dividends

NA.TO vs. VVL.TO - Dividend Comparison

NA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than VVL.TO's 1.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NA.TO
National Bank of Canada
2.38%2.75%4.17%4.03%4.03%3.11%3.96%3.77%4.44%3.70%4.03%5.16%
VVL.TO
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD
1.69%1.89%2.19%2.65%2.52%1.48%1.67%2.60%2.11%1.33%0.59%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NA.TO and VVL.TO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NA.TO and VVL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer