N4US.L vs. XLKQ.L
N4US.L (Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (USD Hdg)) and XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - N4US.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (USD Hdg), while XLKQ.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, N4US.L returned 16.63%/yr vs 25.44%/yr for XLKQ.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. N4US.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKQ.L.
Performance
N4US.L vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
N4US.L is traded in USD, while XLKQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLKQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, N4US.L achieves a 22.05% return, which is significantly higher than XLKQ.L's 17.97% return. Over the past 10 years, N4US.L has underperformed XLKQ.L with an annualized return of 16.63%, while XLKQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 25.44% annualized return.
N4US.L
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 1.76%
- 6M
- 14.49%
- YTD
- 22.05%
- 1Y
- 50.55%
- 3Y*
- 29.24%
- 5Y*
- 22.54%
- 10Y*
- 16.63%
XLKQ.L
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- 6M
- 20.54%
- YTD
- 17.97%
- 1Y
- 32.89%
- 3Y*
- 31.49%
- 5Y*
- 22.29%
- 10Y*
- 25.44%
N4US.L vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N4US.L Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (USD Hdg) | 22.05% | 30.25% | 23.77% | 35.97% | -1.05% | 11.18% | 10.79% | 19.49% | -15.75% | 22.99% |
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | 17.97% | 24.49% | 41.63% | 59.85% | -29.07% | 35.05% | 42.15% | 50.17% | -3.26% | 33.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between N4US.L and XLKQ.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2015 | 0.55 |
The correlation between N4US.L and XLKQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
N4US.L vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
N4US.L
XLKQ.L
N4US.L vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (USD Hdg) (N4US.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| N4US.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.26 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.38 | 1.95 | +3.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.45 | 5.35 | +13.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
N4US.L vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum N4US.L drawdown since its inception was -30.94%, smaller than the maximum XLKQ.L drawdown of -39.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for N4US.L and XLKQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| N4US.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.94% | -39.80% | +8.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.35% | -16.81% | +7.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.38% | -26.96% | +5.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.38% | -35.00% | +13.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.94% | -35.00% | +4.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.87% | -7.48% | +5.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -9.18% | +2.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 6.13% | -3.40% |
Volatility
N4US.L vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (USD Hdg) (N4US.L) is 6.06%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a volatility of 7.47%. This indicates that N4US.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| N4US.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.06% | 7.47% | -1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.47% | 17.08% | -1.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.47% | 21.52% | -2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 27.46% | -8.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 23.97% | -5.60% |
N4US.L vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
N4US.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
N4US.L vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither N4US.L nor XLKQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
N4US.L and XLKQ.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLKQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for N4US.L.
N4US.L is categorized as Global Equities, while XLKQ.L is Technology Equities. N4US.L tracks Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (USD Hdg), while XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for N4US.L and 0.14% for XLKQ.L.
Find the right allocation for N4US.L and XLKQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer