PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
N4US.L vs. IWVG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

N4US.L vs. IWVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (USD Hdg) (N4US.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

N4US.L is traded in USD, while IWVG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IWVG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, N4US.L achieves a 22.05% return, which is significantly lower than IWVG.L's 29.21% return.


N4US.L

1D
-0.97%
1M
1.76%
6M
14.49%
YTD
22.05%
1Y
50.55%
3Y*
29.24%
5Y*
22.54%
10Y*
16.63%

IWVG.L

1D
-1.38%
1M
-4.12%
6M
25.30%
YTD
29.21%
1Y
56.72%
3Y*
26.65%
5Y*
16.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

N4US.L vs. IWVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
N4US.L
Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (USD Hdg)
22.05%30.25%23.77%35.97%-1.05%11.18%10.79%19.49%-11.95%
IWVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
29.21%41.17%4.80%19.04%-9.76%20.14%-4.01%19.28%-16.25%

Correlation

The correlation between N4US.L and IWVG.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2018

0.69

The correlation between N4US.L and IWVG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

N4US.L vs. IWVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

N4US.L
N4US.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
N4US.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
N4US.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
N4US.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
N4US.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
N4US.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

IWVG.L
IWVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
IWVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

N4US.L vs. IWVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (USD Hdg) (N4US.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


N4US.LIWVG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.60

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.38

6.55

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.45

23.13

-4.68

N4US.L vs. IWVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current N4US.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the IWVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of N4US.L and IWVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

N4US.L vs. IWVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum N4US.L drawdown since its inception was -30.94%, smaller than the maximum IWVG.L drawdown of -35.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for N4US.L and IWVG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


N4US.LIWVG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.94%

-35.79%

+4.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.35%

-8.62%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.38%

-14.64%

-6.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.38%

-26.94%

+5.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.87%

-4.24%

+2.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-6.64%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

2.45%

+0.28%

Volatility

N4US.L vs. IWVG.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (USD Hdg) (N4US.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L) have volatilities of 6.06% and 6.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


N4US.LIWVG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.06%

6.03%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.47%

13.95%

+1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.47%

16.24%

+3.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.48%

15.95%

+2.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.37%

17.66%

+0.71%

N4US.L vs. IWVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

N4US.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IWVG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

N4US.L vs. IWVG.L - Dividend Comparison

N4US.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IWVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.93%2.48%3.12%3.22%3.11%2.61%2.37%2.90%2.48%
N4US.L
Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (USD Hdg)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


N4US.L and IWVG.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, N4US.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

N4US.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IWVG.L.

N4US.L tracks Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (USD Hdg), while IWVG.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for N4US.L and 0.30% for IWVG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for N4US.L and IWVG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer