PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
N4US.L vs. IJPD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

N4US.L vs. IJPD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (N4US.L) and iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IJPD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with N4US.L having a 18.80% return and IJPD.L slightly lower at 18.28%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with N4US.L having a 16.34% annualized return and IJPD.L not far behind at 15.96%.


N4US.L

1D
-2.01%
1M
-2.75%
6M
11.38%
YTD
18.80%
1Y
45.47%
3Y*
27.49%
5Y*
21.88%
10Y*
16.34%

IJPD.L

1D
-2.48%
1M
-4.39%
6M
10.41%
YTD
18.28%
1Y
46.30%
3Y*
26.92%
5Y*
21.11%
10Y*
15.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

N4US.L vs. IJPD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
N4US.L
Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc)
18.80%30.25%23.77%35.97%-1.05%11.18%10.79%19.49%-15.75%22.99%
IJPD.L
iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating
18.28%29.04%24.14%35.59%-3.08%12.22%10.80%18.74%-14.26%20.81%

Correlation

The correlation between N4US.L and IJPD.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2015

0.97

The correlation between N4US.L and IJPD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

N4US.L vs. IJPD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

N4US.L
N4US.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
N4US.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
N4US.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
N4US.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
N4US.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
N4US.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

IJPD.L
IJPD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IJPD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJPD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJPD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
IJPD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJPD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

N4US.L vs. IJPD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (N4US.L) and iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IJPD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


N4US.LIJPD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.40

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.84

4.95

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.48

16.11

+0.37

N4US.L vs. IJPD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current N4US.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the IJPD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of N4US.L and IJPD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

N4US.L vs. IJPD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum N4US.L drawdown since its inception was -30.94%, roughly equal to the maximum IJPD.L drawdown of -31.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for N4US.L and IJPD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


N4US.LIJPD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.94%

-31.09%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.35%

-9.32%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.38%

-21.80%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.38%

-21.80%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.94%

-31.09%

+0.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.48%

-6.31%

+1.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-6.71%

-0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

2.87%

-0.12%

Volatility

N4US.L vs. IJPD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (N4US.L) is 6.15%, while iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IJPD.L) has a volatility of 6.81%. This indicates that N4US.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJPD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


N4US.LIJPD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.15%

6.81%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.63%

16.69%

-1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.57%

20.90%

-1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.50%

19.00%

-0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.38%

18.66%

-0.28%

N4US.L vs. IJPD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

N4US.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IJPD.L's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

N4US.L vs. IJPD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither N4US.L nor IJPD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, N4US.L and IJPD.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, N4US.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

N4US.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for IJPD.L.

N4US.L tracks JPX-Nikkei 400 USD Hedged Index, while IJPD.L tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Net TR Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for N4US.L and 0.64% for IJPD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for N4US.L and IJPD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer