N1ES.DE vs. EQQB.DE
N1ES.DE (Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc) and EQQB.DE (Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc) are both Nasdaq-100 funds from Invesco - N1ES.DE tracks the Nasdaq 100® ESG while EQQB.DE tracks the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, N1ES.DE returned 25.46%/yr vs 24.52%/yr for EQQB.DE. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. N1ES.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EQQB.DE.
Performance
N1ES.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with N1ES.DE having a 21.31% return and EQQB.DE slightly lower at 20.54%.
N1ES.DE
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 8.84%
- YTD
- 21.31%
- 6M
- 19.74%
- 1Y
- 39.34%
- 3Y*
- 25.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EQQB.DE
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 7.97%
- YTD
- 20.54%
- 6M
- 18.70%
- 1Y
- 36.95%
- 3Y*
- 24.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
N1ES.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N1ES.DE Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc | 21.31% | 8.26% | 33.55% | 51.62% | -16.59% |
EQQB.DE Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc | 20.54% | 6.93% | 33.67% | 51.27% | -17.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between N1ES.DE and EQQB.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2022 | 0.99 |
The correlation between N1ES.DE and EQQB.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
N1ES.DE vs. EQQB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
N1ES.DE
EQQB.DE
N1ES.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (N1ES.DE) and Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQQB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| N1ES.DE | EQQB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.42 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.69 | 3.73 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.62 | 11.10 | -0.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| N1ES.DE | EQQB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 2.39 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.97 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
N1ES.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum N1ES.DE drawdown since its inception was -29.96%, which is greater than EQQB.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for N1ES.DE and EQQB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| N1ES.DE | EQQB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.96% | -26.59% | -3.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.86% | -10.08% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.65% | -26.59% | -0.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -0.82% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.51% | -6.77% | -1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.78% | 3.39% | +0.39% |
Volatility
N1ES.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (N1ES.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQQB.DE) at 4.38%. This indicates that N1ES.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| N1ES.DE | EQQB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.64% | 4.38% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.63% | 10.99% | +0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.59% | 15.73% | +0.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 19.97% | +0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 19.97% | +0.76% |
N1ES.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
N1ES.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQB.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
N1ES.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither N1ES.DE nor EQQB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, N1ES.DE and EQQB.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, N1ES.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
N1ES.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQB.DE.
N1ES.DE tracks Nasdaq 100® ESG, while EQQB.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for N1ES.DE and 0.30% for EQQB.DE.
Find the right allocation for N1ES.DE and EQQB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer