PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MZHSX vs. CCLFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MZHSX vs. CCLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Muzinich U.S. High Yield Credit Fund (MZHSX) and Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MZHSX vs. CCLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MZHSX
Muzinich U.S. High Yield Credit Fund
-1.04%8.27%7.65%9.99%-11.62%4.43%6.82%5.76%
CCLFX
Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund
0.96%8.93%12.62%12.66%2.32%10.38%8.73%2.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MZHSX achieves a -1.04% return, which is significantly lower than CCLFX's 0.96% return.


MZHSX

1D
0.25%
1M
-1.50%
YTD
-1.04%
6M
0.68%
1Y
6.10%
3Y*
7.21%
5Y*
3.02%
10Y*

CCLFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.48%
YTD
0.96%
6M
3.09%
1Y
7.64%
3Y*
10.90%
5Y*
8.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MZHSX vs. CCLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MZHSX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than CCLFX's 3.42% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MZHSX vs. CCLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MZHSX
MZHSX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
MZHSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MZHSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
MZHSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
MZHSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
MZHSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

CCLFX
CCLFX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
CCLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CCLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MZHSX vs. CCLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Muzinich U.S. High Yield Credit Fund (MZHSX) and Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MZHSXCCLFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.90

8.00

-6.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.53

16.02

-13.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

5.88

-4.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

16.71

-14.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.79

101.37

-91.58

MZHSX vs. CCLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MZHSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is lower than the CCLFX Sharpe Ratio of 8.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MZHSX and CCLFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MZHSXCCLFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

8.00

-6.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

5.15

-4.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

4.53

-3.67

Correlation

The correlation between MZHSX and CCLFX is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MZHSX vs. CCLFX - Dividend Comparison

MZHSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.89%, less than CCLFX's 10.37% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MZHSX
Muzinich U.S. High Yield Credit Fund
5.89%6.53%7.00%6.45%5.77%13.18%5.03%5.16%5.45%12.68%
CCLFX
Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund
10.37%10.47%11.27%10.96%3.96%7.03%6.90%0.61%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MZHSX vs. CCLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MZHSX drawdown since its inception was -19.40%, which is greater than CCLFX's maximum drawdown of -3.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MZHSX and CCLFX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MZHSXCCLFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.40%

-3.91%

-15.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.04%

-0.38%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.10%

-2.25%

-12.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.77%

-0.09%

-1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

-0.16%

-2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.60%

0.08%

+0.52%

Volatility

MZHSX vs. CCLFX - Volatility Comparison

Muzinich U.S. High Yield Credit Fund (MZHSX) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX) at 0.23%. This indicates that MZHSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MZHSXCCLFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

0.23%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.81%

0.65%

+1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.27%

0.97%

+2.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.33%

1.74%

+2.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.91%

1.89%

+3.02%