MZCSX vs. ECSIX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MZCSX (Muzinich Credit Opportunities Fund) and ECSIX (Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, MZCSX returned 3.45%/yr vs 4.02%/yr for ECSIX. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MZCSX charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.82%/yr for ECSIX.

Performance

MZCSX vs. ECSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Muzinich Credit Opportunities Fund (MZCSX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund (ECSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MZCSX achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly lower than ECSIX's 1.92% return. Over the past 10 years, MZCSX has underperformed ECSIX with an annualized return of 3.45%, while ECSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.02% annualized return.

MZCSX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.73%
• YTD: 1.08%
• 6M: 1.29%
• 1Y: 4.96%
• 3Y*: 5.72%
• 5Y*: 2.14%
• 10Y*: 3.45%

ECSIX

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.82%
• YTD: 1.92%
• 6M: 2.21%
• 1Y: 8.35%
• 3Y*: 7.36%
• 5Y*: 4.19%
• 10Y*: 4.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MZCSX vs. ECSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MZCSX Muzinich Credit Opportunities Fund	1.08%	6.74%	4.27%	7.48%	-8.41%	1.11%	5.63%	10.77%	0.22%	4.70%
ECSIX Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund	1.92%	10.19%	5.71%	7.31%	-3.31%	0.69%	6.60%	5.76%	-3.37%	4.04%

Correlation

The correlation between MZCSX and ECSIX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.36

Over the past year, MZCSX and ECSIX have become more correlated (0.68) than their long-term average of 0.36, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

MZCSX vs. ECSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MZCSX

MZCSX Risk / Return Rank: 55
MZCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
MZCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
MZCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
MZCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
MZCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

ECSIX

ECSIX Risk / Return Rank: 86
ECSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ECSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
ECSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
ECSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
ECSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MZCSX vs. ECSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Muzinich Credit Opportunities Fund (MZCSX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund (ECSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MZCSX	ECSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	3.01	-0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	4.55	-1.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.66	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	3.53	-1.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.08	12.15	-3.07

MZCSX vs. ECSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MZCSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is lower than the ECSIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MZCSX and ECSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MZCSX vs. ECSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MZCSX drawdown since its inception was -12.56%, roughly equal to the maximum ECSIX drawdown of -12.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MZCSX and ECSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MZCSX	ECSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.56%	-12.95%	+0.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.43%	-2.43%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.26%	-2.64%	-0.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.05%	-7.19%	-4.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-12.56%	-12.53%	-0.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.21%	-0.63%	+0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.60%	-1.34%	-0.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.57%	0.70%	-0.13%

Volatility

MZCSX vs. ECSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Muzinich Credit Opportunities Fund (MZCSX) is 0.66%, while Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund (ECSIX) has a volatility of 0.92%. This indicates that MZCSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MZCSX	ECSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.66%	0.92%	-0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.01%	2.26%	-0.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.53%	2.85%	-0.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.42%	3.22%	+0.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.35%	3.18%	+0.17%

MZCSX vs. ECSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MZCSX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ECSIX's 1.82% expense ratio.

Dividends

MZCSX vs. ECSIX - Dividend Comparison

MZCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, more than ECSIX's 6.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ECSIX Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund	6.32%	5.07%	6.21%	6.18%	4.78%	3.54%	3.47%	3.53%	3.19%	2.96%	3.20%	3.54%
MZCSX Muzinich Credit Opportunities Fund	6.57%	5.96%	5.19%	4.10%	1.35%	8.02%	2.41%	6.52%	2.11%	2.80%	3.99%	2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MZCSX and ECSIX in my portfolio?

MZCSX and ECSIX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MZCSX or ECSIX?

ECSIX has higher volatility (0.92%) compared to MZCSX (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MZCSX dropped -12.56% vs ECSIX's -12.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ECSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.