PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MYMI vs. FFUT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MYMI vs. FFUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street My2029 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMI) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYMI achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly lower than FFUT's 9.23% return.


MYMI

1D
0.00%
1M
0.68%
YTD
1.47%
6M
1.91%
1Y
4.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FFUT

1D
-0.52%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
9.23%
6M
9.36%
1Y
18.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYMI vs. FFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MYMI and FFUT is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025

-0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MYMI vs. FFUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYMI
MYMI Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
MYMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MYMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
MYMI Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
MYMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
MYMI Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FFUT
FFUT Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FFUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFUT Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FFUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFUT Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYMI vs. FFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2029 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMI) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MYMIFFUTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.33

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

4.77

-1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.71

15.04

-4.33

MYMI vs. FFUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYMI Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is higher than the FFUT Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYMI and FFUT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MYMI vs. FFUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYMI drawdown since its inception was -3.11%, smaller than the maximum FFUT drawdown of -3.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYMI and FFUT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MYMIFFUTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.11%

-3.98%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.39%

-3.98%

+2.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-3.98%

+3.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.70%

-0.94%

+0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

1.26%

-0.85%

Volatility

MYMI vs. FFUT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street My2029 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMI) is 0.31%, while Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that MYMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MYMIFFUTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.31%

2.92%

-2.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.20%

8.96%

-7.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64%

11.23%

-9.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.87%

11.03%

-8.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.87%

11.03%

-8.16%

MYMI vs. FFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYMI has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FFUT's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

MYMI vs. FFUT - Dividend Comparison

MYMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than FFUT's 1.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
FFUT
Fidelity Managed Futures ETF
1.91%2.09%0.00%
MYMI
State Street My2029 Municipal Bond ETF
2.87%3.00%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


MYMI and FFUT have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFUT has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to MYMI (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYMI dropped -3.11% vs FFUT's -3.98%.

On 1-year performance, FFUT leads with 18.91% vs 4.42% for MYMI. On fees, MYMI is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, MYMI has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FFUT has performed better with a 18.91% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MYMI is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFUT.

MYMI has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 1.91% for FFUT.

MYMI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while FFUT is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MYMI and 0.80% for FFUT.

MYMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MYMI and FFUT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer