PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MYMH vs. BSMQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MYMH vs. BSMQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street My2028 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMH) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MYMH having a 0.79% return and BSMQ slightly higher at 0.81%.


MYMH

1D
0.04%
1M
0.34%
YTD
0.79%
6M
1.12%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BSMQ

1D
0.07%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.81%
6M
1.18%
1Y
2.98%
3Y*
2.90%
5Y*
0.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYMH vs. BSMQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MYMH
State Street My2028 Municipal Bond ETF
0.79%3.21%-0.96%
BSMQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF
0.81%3.12%0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between MYMH and BSMQ is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024

0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between MYMH and BSMQ has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MYMH vs. BSMQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYMH
MYMH Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
MYMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MYMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
MYMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MYMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MYMH Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

BSMQ
BSMQ Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BSMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYMH vs. BSMQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2028 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMH) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MYMHBSMQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.47

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.41

9.12

-4.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.30

23.88

-11.58

MYMH vs. BSMQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYMH Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is higher than the BSMQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYMH and BSMQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MYMHBSMQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09

2.26

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.25

+0.44

Drawdowns

MYMH vs. BSMQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYMH drawdown since its inception was -2.67%, smaller than the maximum BSMQ drawdown of -13.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYMH and BSMQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MYMHBSMQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.67%

-13.18%

+10.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.90%

-0.33%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-0.05%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.51%

-3.47%

+2.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.32%

0.12%

+0.20%

Volatility

MYMH vs. BSMQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street My2028 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMH) is 0.26%, while Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMQ) has a volatility of 0.40%. This indicates that MYMH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSMQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MYMHBSMQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.26%

0.40%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.89%

0.94%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29%

1.33%

-0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.62%

2.68%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.62%

4.79%

-2.17%

MYMH vs. BSMQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYMH has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMQ's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MYMH vs. BSMQ - Dividend Comparison

MYMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, more than BSMQ's 2.76% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BSMQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF
2.76%2.74%2.75%2.47%1.60%1.14%1.57%0.44%
MYMH
State Street My2028 Municipal Bond ETF
2.91%3.01%0.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MYMH and BSMQ have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSMQ has higher volatility (0.40%) compared to MYMH (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYMH dropped -2.67% vs BSMQ's -13.18%.

On 1-year performance, MYMH leads with 3.94% vs 2.98% for BSMQ. On fees, BSMQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, MYMH has been the lower-risk option at 0.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MYMH has performed better with a 3.94% return vs 2.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSMQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MYMH.

MYMH has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 2.76% for BSMQ.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MYMH and 0.18% for BSMQ.

MYMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MYMH and BSMQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer