MYMH vs. BESF
MYMH (State Street My2028 Municipal Bond ETF) and BESF (Bastion Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MYMH is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by State Street, while BESF is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Bastion. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MYMH returned 3.94% vs 70.53% for BESF. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. MYMH charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for BESF.
Performance
MYMH vs. BESF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MYMH achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than BESF's 20.81% return.
MYMH
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BESF
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- 20.81%
- 6M
- 20.48%
- 1Y
- 70.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MYMH vs. BESF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MYMH State Street My2028 Municipal Bond ETF | 0.79% | 3.13% |
BESF Bastion Energy ETF | 20.81% | 41.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between MYMH and BESF is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | -0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MYMH vs. BESF — Risk / Return Rank
MYMH
BESF
MYMH vs. BESF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2028 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMH) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MYMH | BESF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.77 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.41 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.30 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MYMH | BESF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 2.92 | -2.24 |
Drawdowns
MYMH vs. BESF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MYMH drawdown since its inception was -2.67%, smaller than the maximum BESF drawdown of -9.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYMH and BESF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MYMH | BESF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.67% | -9.89% | +7.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.90% | -9.89% | +8.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -5.04% | +4.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.51% | -2.46% | +1.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.32% | — | — |
Volatility
MYMH vs. BESF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MYMH | BESF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.26% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.89% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29% | 24.29% | -23.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.62% | 24.29% | -21.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.62% | 24.29% | -21.67% |
MYMH vs. BESF - Expense Ratio Comparison
MYMH has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BESF's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
MYMH vs. BESF - Dividend Comparison
MYMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than BESF's 5.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BESF Bastion Energy ETF | 5.63% | 6.39% | 0.00% |
MYMH State Street My2028 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.91% | 3.01% | 0.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MYMH and BESF have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, BESF leads with 70.53% vs 3.94% for MYMH. On fees, MYMH is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BESF has performed better with a 70.53% return vs 3.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MYMH is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BESF.
BESF has the higher dividend yield at 5.63%, compared with 2.91% for MYMH.
MYMH is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while BESF is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Bastion. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MYMH and 0.80% for BESF.
Find the right allocation for MYMH and BESF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer