PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MYMF vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MYMF vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMF) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYMF achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's -4.79% return.


MYMF

1D
0.00%
1M
0.37%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.80%
1Y
2.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLD

1D
-1.89%
1M
-8.82%
YTD
-4.79%
6M
-8.78%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
28.41%
5Y*
17.84%
10Y*
11.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYMF vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MYMF
State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF
0.74%3.01%0.07%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
-4.79%63.68%-0.23%

Correlation

The correlation between MYMF and GLD is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2024

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MYMF vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYMF
MYMF Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
MYMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MYMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
MYMF Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MYMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
MYMF Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYMF vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMF) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MYMFGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.19

1.17

+1.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.40

0.87

+6.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.37

2.35

+25.02

MYMF vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYMF Sharpe Ratio is 3.85, which is higher than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYMF and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MYMF vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYMF drawdown since its inception was -2.02%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYMF and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MYMFGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.02%

-45.56%

+43.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.38%

-24.46%

+24.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-23.91%

+23.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.18%

-16.17%

+15.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.10%

9.10%

-9.00%

Volatility

MYMF vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMF) is 0.24%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 8.18%. This indicates that MYMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MYMFGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.24%

8.18%

-7.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.54%

24.38%

-23.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73%

27.57%

-26.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.63%

18.24%

-16.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.63%

16.04%

-14.41%

MYMF vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYMF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

MYMF vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

MYMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%
MYMF
State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF
2.47%2.80%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


MYMF and GLD have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLD has higher volatility (8.18%) compared to MYMF (0.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYMF dropped -2.02% vs GLD's -45.56%.

On 1-year performance, GLD leads with 21.29% vs 2.81% for MYMF. On fees, MYMF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, MYMF has been the lower-risk option at 0.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GLD has performed better with a 21.29% return vs 2.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MYMF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

MYMF has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

MYMF is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while GLD is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MYMF and 0.40% for GLD.

MYMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.85 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MYMF and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer