MYHB vs. HYHG
MYHB (State Street My2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and HYHG (ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged) are both High Yield Bonds funds - MYHB tracks the ICE 2028 Maturity US High Yield Index while HYHG tracks the Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MYHB charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HYHG.
Performance
MYHB vs. HYHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MYHB
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
HYHG
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- 4.07%
- 1Y
- 7.70%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.14%
- 10Y*
- 6.15%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.06M | $1.52M | $1.17M | |
| $1.36K | $1.00K | $8.02K |
MYHB vs. HYHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MYHB State Street My2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 2.03% |
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 3.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between MYHB and HYHG is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2026 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MYHB vs. HYHG — Risk / Return Rank
MYHB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HYHG
MYHB vs. HYHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (MYHB) and ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MYHB | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.38 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MYHB vs. HYHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MYHB drawdown since its inception was -1.09%, smaller than the maximum HYHG drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYHB and HYHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MYHB | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.09% | -25.71% | +24.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.14% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.18% | -3.01% | +2.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.61% | — |
Volatility
MYHB vs. HYHG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MYHB | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.78% | 5.64% | -2.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.78% | 8.17% | -5.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.78% | 9.06% | -6.28% |
MYHB vs. HYHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MYHB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than HYHG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MYHB vs. HYHG - Dividend Comparison
MYHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than HYHG's 6.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 6.14% | 6.97% | 6.57% | 6.07% | 5.58% | 4.54% | 5.21% | 6.06% | 6.45% | 5.57% | 5.37% | 6.37% |
MYHB State Street My2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 2.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MYHB and HYHG have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MYHB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MYHB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HYHG.
HYHG has the higher dividend yield at 6.14%, compared with 2.22% for MYHB.
MYHB tracks ICE 2028 Maturity US High Yield Index, while HYHG tracks Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MYHB and 0.50% for HYHG.
Find the right allocation for MYHB and HYHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer