MYCN vs. BESF

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

MYCN (State Street My2034 Corporate Bond ETF) and BESF (Bastion Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MYCN is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by State Street, while BESF is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Bastion. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MYCN returned 6.06% vs 67.71% for BESF. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. MYCN charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for BESF.

Performance

MYCN vs. BESF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street My2034 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCN) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYCN achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than BESF's 18.04% return.

MYCN

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: -0.73%
• YTD: -0.02%
• 6M: 0.13%
• 1Y: 6.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BESF

• 1D: -2.29%
• 1M: -0.91%
• YTD: 18.04%
• 6M: 16.14%
• 1Y: 67.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYCN vs. BESF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MYCN State Street My2034 Corporate Bond ETF	-0.02%	5.78%
BESF Bastion Energy ETF	18.04%	41.15%

Correlation

The correlation between MYCN and BESF is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	-0.15

Return for Risk

MYCN vs. BESF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYCN

MYCN Risk / Return Rank: 42
MYCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
MYCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
MYCN Omega Ratio Rank: 40
MYCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
MYCN Martin Ratio Rank: 44

BESF

BESF Risk / Return Rank: 88
BESF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
BESF Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
BESF Omega Ratio Rank: 81
BESF Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
BESF Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYCN vs. BESF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2034 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCN) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MYCN	BESF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	2.79	-1.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	3.65	-1.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.45	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	6.88	-4.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.66	19.29	-12.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MYCN vs. BESF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYCN Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the BESF Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYCN and BESF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MYCN	BESF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36	2.79	-1.43
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	2.74	-2.18

Drawdowns

MYCN vs. BESF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYCN drawdown since its inception was -5.01%, smaller than the maximum BESF drawdown of -9.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYCN and BESF.

Drawdown Indicators

	MYCN	BESF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.01%	-9.89%	+4.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.03%	-9.89%	+6.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.66%	-7.21%	+5.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.26%	-2.47%	+1.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.91%	3.52%	-2.61%

Volatility

MYCN vs. BESF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street My2034 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCN) is 1.48%, while Bastion Energy ETF (BESF) has a volatility of 6.65%. This indicates that MYCN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BESF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MYCN	BESF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.48%	6.65%	-5.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.35%	14.71%	-11.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.48%	24.37%	-19.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.64%	24.37%	-18.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.64%	24.37%	-18.73%

MYCN vs. BESF - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYCN has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BESF's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

MYCN vs. BESF - Dividend Comparison

MYCN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, less than BESF's 5.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BESF Bastion Energy ETF	5.76%	6.39%	0.00%
MYCN State Street My2034 Corporate Bond ETF	5.02%	4.92%	1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MYCN and BESF in my portfolio?

MYCN and BESF have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MYCN or BESF?

BESF has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to MYCN (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYCN dropped -5.01% vs BESF's -9.89%.

Which ETF is better, MYCN or BESF?

On 1-year performance, BESF leads with 67.71% vs 6.06% for MYCN. On fees, MYCN is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MYCN has been the lower-risk option at 1.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MYCN or BESF?

Over the 1-year period, BESF has performed better with a 67.71% return vs 6.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MYCN or BESF?

MYCN is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BESF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MYCN or BESF?

BESF has the higher dividend yield at 5.76%, compared with 5.02% for MYCN.

What is the main difference between MYCN and BESF?

MYCN is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while BESF is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Bastion. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MYCN and 0.80% for BESF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BESF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.