PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MYCM vs. VCSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MYCM vs. VCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street My2033 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCM) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYCM achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than VCSH's 0.64% return.


MYCM

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.38%
1Y
6.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VCSH

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.64%
6M
0.95%
1Y
4.59%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
2.32%
10Y*
2.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYCM vs. VCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MYCM
State Street My2033 Corporate Bond ETF
0.42%9.21%-3.14%
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.64%6.77%-0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between MYCM and VCSH is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024

0.90

The correlation between MYCM and VCSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MYCM vs. VCSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYCM
MYCM Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
MYCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MYCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
MYCM Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
MYCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MYCM Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

VCSH
VCSH Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
VCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYCM vs. VCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2033 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCM) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MYCMVCSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.48

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

3.29

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.98

13.55

-5.57

MYCM vs. VCSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYCM Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the VCSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYCM and VCSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MYCMVCSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

2.45

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

1.02

-0.30

Drawdowns

MYCM vs. VCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYCM drawdown since its inception was -4.58%, smaller than the maximum VCSH drawdown of -12.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYCM and VCSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MYCMVCSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.58%

-12.86%

+8.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.74%

-1.40%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-0.32%

-0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.08%

-0.97%

-0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

0.34%

+0.48%

Volatility

MYCM vs. VCSH - Volatility Comparison

State Street My2033 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCM) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) at 0.57%. This indicates that MYCM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MYCMVCSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

0.57%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

1.38%

+1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.97%

1.88%

+2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.12%

2.88%

+2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.12%

3.35%

+1.77%

MYCM vs. VCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYCM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VCSH's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MYCM vs. VCSH - Dividend Comparison

MYCM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, more than VCSH's 4.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MYCM
State Street My2033 Corporate Bond ETF
4.74%4.70%1.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.45%4.35%3.96%3.09%2.01%1.81%2.27%2.87%2.65%2.26%2.10%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, MYCM and VCSH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MYCM has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to VCSH (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYCM dropped -4.58% vs VCSH's -12.86%.

On 1-year performance, MYCM leads with 6.52% vs 4.59% for VCSH. On fees, VCSH is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VCSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MYCM has performed better with a 6.52% return vs 4.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCSH is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MYCM.

MYCM has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 4.45% for VCSH.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MYCM and 0.04% for VCSH.

VCSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MYCM and VCSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer