MYCL vs. FFUT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

MYCL (State Street My2032 Corporate Bond ETF) and FFUT (Fidelity Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MYCL is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by State Street, while FFUT is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MYCL returned 2.68% vs 23.75% for FFUT. Their -0.32 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. MYCL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFUT.

Performance

MYCL vs. FFUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street My2032 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCL) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYCL achieves a -0.19% return, which is significantly lower than FFUT's 13.58% return.

MYCL

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -0.96%
• 6M: -0.62%
• YTD: -0.19%
• 1Y: 2.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.00%

FFUT

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 5.46%
• 6M: 9.55%
• YTD: 13.58%
• 1Y: 23.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	$7.77M	$4.00M	$2.01M
MYCL State Street My2032 Corporate Bond ETF	$300.06K	$184.68K	$82.77K

MYCL vs. FFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MYCL State Street My2032 Corporate Bond ETF	-0.19%	5.36%
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	13.58%	8.58%

Correlation

The correlation between MYCL and FFUT is -0.35, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	-0.32

Return for Risk

MYCL vs. FFUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MYCL

MYCL Risk / Return Rank: 35
MYCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
MYCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
MYCL Omega Ratio Rank: 33
MYCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
MYCL Martin Ratio Rank: 35

FFUT

FFUT Risk / Return Rank: 88
FFUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FFUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FFUT Omega Ratio Rank: 87
FFUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FFUT Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MYCL vs. FFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2032 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCL) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MYCL	FFUT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	2.02	-1.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	2.85	-1.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.38	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.26	4.20	-2.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.40	14.36	-10.96

MYCL vs. FFUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYCL Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the FFUT Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYCL and FFUT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MYCL vs. FFUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYCL drawdown since its inception was -4.39%, smaller than the maximum FFUT drawdown of -5.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYCL and FFUT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MYCL	FFUT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.39%	-5.59%	+1.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.77%	-5.59%	+2.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.88%	-1.43%	-0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.09%	-1.11%	+0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.03%	1.63%	-0.60%

Volatility

MYCL vs. FFUT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street My2032 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCL) is 1.09%, while Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that MYCL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MYCL	FFUT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.09%	3.61%	-2.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.08%	9.27%	-6.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.82%	11.67%	-7.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.80%	11.09%	-6.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.80%	11.09%	-6.29%

MYCL vs. FFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYCL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FFUT's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

MYCL vs. FFUT - Dividend Comparison

MYCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than FFUT's 1.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	1.84%	2.09%	0.00%
MYCL State Street My2032 Corporate Bond ETF	4.30%	4.60%	1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MYCL and FFUT in my portfolio?

MYCL and FFUT have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MYCL or FFUT?

FFUT has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to MYCL (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYCL dropped -4.39% vs FFUT's -5.59%.

Which ETF is better, MYCL or FFUT?

On 1-year performance, FFUT leads with 23.75% vs 2.68% for MYCL. On fees, MYCL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MYCL has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MYCL or FFUT?

Over the 1-year period, FFUT has performed better with a 23.75% return vs 2.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MYCL or FFUT?

MYCL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFUT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MYCL or FFUT?

MYCL has the higher dividend yield at 4.30%, compared with 1.84% for FFUT.

What is the main difference between MYCL and FFUT?

MYCL is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while FFUT is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MYCL and 0.80% for FFUT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.