MYCK vs. BSCQ
MYCK (State Street My2031 Corporate Bond ETF) and BSCQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. MYCK is actively managed, while BSCQ is passively managed. Over the past year, MYCK returned 5.30% vs 4.39% for BSCQ. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MYCK charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BSCQ.
Performance
MYCK vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MYCK achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than BSCQ's 1.55% return.
MYCK
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 5.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSCQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 4.39%
- 3Y*
- 5.05%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- —
MYCK vs. BSCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MYCK State Street My2031 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.41% | 8.87% | -2.50% |
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.55% | 5.02% | 0.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between MYCK and BSCQ is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MYCK and BSCQ has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MYCK vs. BSCQ — Risk / Return Rank
MYCK
BSCQ
MYCK vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2031 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCK) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MYCK | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -12.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 3.43 | -2.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 42.97 | -40.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.57 | 178.56 | -170.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MYCK | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 7.01 | -5.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.60 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
MYCK vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MYCK drawdown since its inception was -3.69%, smaller than the maximum BSCQ drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYCK and BSCQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MYCK | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.69% | -16.50% | +12.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.34% | -0.10% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | 0.00% | -1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.84% | -2.85% | +2.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.70% | 0.02% | +0.68% |
Volatility
MYCK vs. BSCQ - Volatility Comparison
State Street My2031 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCK) has a higher volatility of 1.03% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) at 0.17%. This indicates that MYCK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MYCK | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.03% | 0.17% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.38% | 0.43% | +1.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.35% | 0.63% | +2.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.25% | 3.30% | +0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.25% | 4.77% | -0.52% |
MYCK vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MYCK has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCQ's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MYCK vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison
MYCK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, more than BSCQ's 4.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.12% | 4.14% | 4.05% | 3.53% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.42% | 2.96% | 3.32% | 2.92% | 0.51% |
MYCK State Street My2031 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.55% | 4.55% | 1.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MYCK and BSCQ have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MYCK has higher volatility (1.03%) compared to BSCQ (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYCK dropped -3.69% vs BSCQ's -16.50%.
On 1-year performance, MYCK leads with 5.30% vs 4.39% for BSCQ. On fees, BSCQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MYCK has performed better with a 5.30% return vs 4.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSCQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MYCK.
MYCK has the higher dividend yield at 4.55%, compared with 4.12% for BSCQ.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MYCK and 0.10% for BSCQ.
BSCQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.01 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MYCK and BSCQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer