PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MYCJ vs. FFUT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MYCJ vs. FFUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street My2030 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCJ) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYCJ achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly lower than FFUT's 13.58% return.


MYCJ

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.65%
6M
-0.18%
YTD
0.04%
1Y
2.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.17%

FFUT

1D
-0.23%
1M
5.46%
6M
9.55%
YTD
13.58%
1Y
23.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.77M$4.00M$2.01M
$399.37K$233.99K$181.35K

MYCJ vs. FFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MYCJ and FFUT is -0.37, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025

-0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MYCJ vs. FFUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MYCJ
MYCJ Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
MYCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MYCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MYCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
MYCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
MYCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FFUT
FFUT Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FFUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFUT Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FFUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFUT Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MYCJ vs. FFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2030 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCJ) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MYCJFFUTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.38

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

4.20

-2.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.83

14.36

-9.53

MYCJ vs. FFUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYCJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the FFUT Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYCJ and FFUT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MYCJ vs. FFUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYCJ drawdown since its inception was -3.29%, smaller than the maximum FFUT drawdown of -5.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYCJ and FFUT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MYCJFFUTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.29%

-5.59%

+2.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.02%

-5.59%

+3.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-1.43%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.76%

-1.11%

+0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

1.63%

-0.95%

Volatility

MYCJ vs. FFUT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street My2030 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCJ) is 0.73%, while Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that MYCJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MYCJFFUTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

3.61%

-2.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.17%

9.27%

-7.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75%

11.67%

-8.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.59%

11.09%

-7.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.59%

11.09%

-7.50%

MYCJ vs. FFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYCJ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FFUT's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

MYCJ vs. FFUT - Dividend Comparison

MYCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than FFUT's 1.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
FFUT
Fidelity Managed Futures ETF
1.84%2.09%0.00%
MYCJ
State Street My2030 Corporate Bond ETF
4.24%4.68%1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


MYCJ and FFUT have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFUT has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to MYCJ (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYCJ dropped -3.29% vs FFUT's -5.59%.

On 1-year performance, FFUT leads with 23.75% vs 2.51% for MYCJ. On fees, MYCJ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MYCJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FFUT has performed better with a 23.75% return vs 2.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MYCJ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFUT.

MYCJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 1.84% for FFUT.

MYCJ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while FFUT is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MYCJ and 0.80% for FFUT.

FFUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MYCJ and FFUT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer