PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MYCI vs. FFUT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MYCI vs. FFUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCI) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYCI achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly lower than FFUT's 8.83% return.


MYCI

1D
0.14%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.55%
6M
0.87%
1Y
4.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FFUT

1D
-0.36%
1M
-2.69%
YTD
8.83%
6M
9.28%
1Y
18.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYCI vs. FFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MYCI and FFUT is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025

-0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MYCI vs. FFUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYCI
MYCI Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
MYCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MYCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
MYCI Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
MYCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
MYCI Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FFUT
FFUT Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FFUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFUT Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FFUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFUT Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYCI vs. FFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCI) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MYCIFFUTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.32

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

4.35

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.68

14.55

-4.87

MYCI vs. FFUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYCI Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the FFUT Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYCI and FFUT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MYCI vs. FFUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYCI drawdown since its inception was -2.43%, smaller than the maximum FFUT drawdown of -4.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYCI and FFUT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MYCIFFUTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.43%

-4.33%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.56%

-4.33%

+2.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-4.33%

+3.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.54%

-0.96%

+0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.44%

1.29%

-0.85%

Volatility

MYCI vs. FFUT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCI) is 0.69%, while Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that MYCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MYCIFFUTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

2.93%

-2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.59%

8.97%

-7.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18%

11.22%

-9.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.01%

11.02%

-8.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.01%

11.02%

-8.01%

MYCI vs. FFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYCI has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FFUT's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

MYCI vs. FFUT - Dividend Comparison

MYCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, more than FFUT's 1.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
FFUT
Fidelity Managed Futures ETF
1.92%2.09%0.00%
MYCI
State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF
4.57%4.56%1.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


MYCI and FFUT have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFUT has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to MYCI (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYCI dropped -2.43% vs FFUT's -4.33%.

On 1-year performance, FFUT leads with 18.72% vs 4.23% for MYCI. On fees, MYCI is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MYCI has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FFUT has performed better with a 18.72% return vs 4.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MYCI is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFUT.

MYCI has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 1.92% for FFUT.

MYCI is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while FFUT is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MYCI and 0.80% for FFUT.

MYCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MYCI and FFUT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer