PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MYCI vs. BIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MYCI vs. BIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCI) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYCI achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly higher than BIV's -0.24% return.


MYCI

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.45%
6M
0.87%
1Y
4.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BIV

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.04%
YTD
-0.24%
6M
-0.48%
1Y
4.80%
3Y*
4.27%
5Y*
0.25%
10Y*
1.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYCI vs. BIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MYCI
State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF
0.45%7.59%-1.56%
BIV
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF
-0.24%8.52%-3.70%

Correlation

The correlation between MYCI and BIV is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024

0.93

The correlation between MYCI and BIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MYCI vs. BIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYCI
MYCI Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MYCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MYCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
MYCI Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
MYCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
MYCI Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

BIV
BIV Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
BIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYCI vs. BIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCI) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MYCIBIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.21

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

1.52

+1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.23

4.60

+6.63

MYCI vs. BIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYCI Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the BIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYCI and BIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MYCIBIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

1.19

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

0.65

+0.60

Drawdowns

MYCI vs. BIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYCI drawdown since its inception was -2.41%, smaller than the maximum BIV drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYCI and BIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MYCIBIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.41%

-18.95%

+16.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.56%

-3.18%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-2.04%

+1.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.54%

-3.39%

+2.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

1.05%

-0.63%

Volatility

MYCI vs. BIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCI) is 0.59%, while Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) has a volatility of 1.36%. This indicates that MYCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MYCIBIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.59%

1.36%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.50%

2.90%

-1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22%

4.06%

-1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.02%

6.40%

-3.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.02%

5.50%

-2.48%

MYCI vs. BIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYCI has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BIV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MYCI vs. BIV - Dividend Comparison

MYCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, more than BIV's 4.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIV
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF
4.22%4.01%3.79%3.09%2.41%3.42%2.95%2.75%2.88%2.69%3.01%3.02%
MYCI
State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF
4.57%4.56%1.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, MYCI and BIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BIV has higher volatility (1.36%) compared to MYCI (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYCI dropped -2.41% vs BIV's -18.95%.

On 1-year performance, BIV leads with 4.80% vs 4.75% for MYCI. On fees, BIV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, MYCI has been the lower-risk option at 0.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BIV has performed better with a 4.80% return vs 4.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BIV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MYCI.

MYCI has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 4.22% for BIV.

MYCI is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while BIV is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MYCI and 0.03% for BIV.

MYCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MYCI and BIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer