PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MYCG vs. ACLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MYCG vs. ACLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street My2027 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCG) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYCG achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than ACLO's 2.44% return.


MYCG

1D
0.04%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.72%
1Y
4.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ACLO

1D
0.03%
1M
0.44%
YTD
2.44%
6M
2.55%
1Y
5.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYCG vs. ACLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MYCG
State Street My2027 Corporate Bond ETF
1.50%5.85%0.49%
ACLO
TCW AAA CLO ETF
2.44%5.32%0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between MYCG and ACLO is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2024

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MYCG vs. ACLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYCG
MYCG Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
MYCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MYCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
MYCG Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MYCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
MYCG Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

ACLO
ACLO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ACLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACLO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ACLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYCG vs. ACLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2027 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCG) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MYCGACLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.20

3.42

-1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.97

19.77

-9.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

47.91

164.39

-116.48

MYCG vs. ACLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYCG Sharpe Ratio is 4.58, which is lower than the ACLO Sharpe Ratio of 7.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYCG and ACLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MYCG vs. ACLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYCG drawdown since its inception was -0.86%, smaller than the maximum ACLO drawdown of -1.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYCG and ACLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MYCGACLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.86%

-1.01%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.45%

-0.27%

-0.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.14%

-0.04%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.09%

0.03%

+0.06%

Volatility

MYCG vs. ACLO - Volatility Comparison

State Street My2027 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCG) has a higher volatility of 0.22% compared to TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) at 0.19%. This indicates that MYCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MYCGACLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.22%

0.19%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.53%

0.58%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98%

0.73%

+0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.48%

1.07%

+0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.48%

1.07%

+0.41%

MYCG vs. ACLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYCG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ACLO's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MYCG vs. ACLO - Dividend Comparison

MYCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, less than ACLO's 4.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ACLO
TCW AAA CLO ETF
4.90%4.87%0.59%
MYCG
State Street My2027 Corporate Bond ETF
4.28%4.28%1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


MYCG and ACLO have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MYCG has higher volatility (0.22%) compared to ACLO (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYCG dropped -0.86% vs ACLO's -1.01%.

On 1-year performance, ACLO leads with 5.27% vs 4.43% for MYCG. On fees, MYCG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ACLO has performed better with a 5.27% return vs 4.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MYCG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ACLO.

ACLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 4.28% for MYCG.

MYCG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while ACLO is CLO. They also come from different issuers: State Street and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MYCG and 0.20% for ACLO.

ACLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.28 vs 4.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MYCG and ACLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer