MXXVX vs. FLCPX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MXXVX (Matthew 25 Fund) and FLCPX (Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MXXVX returned 14.67%/yr vs 15.80%/yr for FLCPX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MXXVX charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for FLCPX.

Performance

MXXVX vs. FLCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthew 25 Fund (MXXVX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MXXVX having a 9.65% return and FLCPX slightly higher at 9.81%. Over the past 10 years, MXXVX has underperformed FLCPX with an annualized return of 14.67%, while FLCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.80% annualized return.

MXXVX

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 1.06%
• YTD: 9.65%
• 6M: 8.64%
• 1Y: 28.85%
• 3Y*: 24.88%
• 5Y*: 10.88%
• 10Y*: 14.67%

FLCPX

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 0.10%
• YTD: 9.81%
• 6M: 8.81%
• 1Y: 25.50%
• 3Y*: 21.42%
• 5Y*: 13.62%
• 10Y*: 15.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXXVX vs. FLCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MXXVX Matthew 25 Fund	9.65%	18.64%	27.41%	36.76%	-30.19%	22.19%	12.77%	42.15%	-19.39%	24.69%
FLCPX Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund	9.81%	17.84%	25.08%	26.25%	-18.06%	28.61%	18.24%	31.59%	-4.38%	21.74%

Correlation

The correlation between MXXVX and FLCPX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2016	0.83

The correlation between MXXVX and FLCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MXXVX vs. FLCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXXVX

MXXVX Risk / Return Rank: 39
MXXVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
MXXVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
MXXVX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
MXXVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
MXXVX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

FLCPX

FLCPX Risk / Return Rank: 66
FLCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FLCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
FLCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FLCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FLCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXXVX vs. FLCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthew 25 Fund (MXXVX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MXXVX	FLCPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	2.16	-0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	2.92	-0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.39	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	3.03	-0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.30	13.66	-4.36

MXXVX vs. FLCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXXVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the FLCPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXXVX and FLCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MXXVX vs. FLCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXXVX drawdown since its inception was -96.53%, which is greater than FLCPX's maximum drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXXVX and FLCPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MXXVX	FLCPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.53%	-33.87%	-62.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.84%	-8.89%	-3.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-96.53%	-18.76%	-77.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.53%	-24.40%	-72.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-96.53%	-33.87%	-62.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.18%	-1.71%	-92.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.43%	-4.17%	-10.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.30%	1.97%	+1.33%

Volatility

MXXVX vs. FLCPX - Volatility Comparison

Matthew 25 Fund (MXXVX) has a higher volatility of 7.58% compared to Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) at 4.67%. This indicates that MXXVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MXXVX	FLCPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.58%	4.67%	+2.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.17%	9.90%	+5.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.05%	12.51%	+6.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	383.28%	17.16%	+366.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	271.44%	18.21%	+253.23%

MXXVX vs. FLCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXXVX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCPX's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

MXXVX vs. FLCPX - Dividend Comparison

MXXVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.47%, more than FLCPX's 0.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLCPX Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund	0.51%	0.56%	6.11%	7.05%	11.23%	10.38%	3.93%	1.74%	2.18%	1.57%	0.76%	0.00%
MXXVX Matthew 25 Fund	13.47%	14.77%	7.24%	8.17%	7.84%	11.98%	11.20%	1.88%	19.45%	7.65%	9.66%	8.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MXXVX and FLCPX in my portfolio?

MXXVX and FLCPX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MXXVX or FLCPX?

MXXVX has higher volatility (7.58%) compared to FLCPX (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXXVX dropped -96.53% vs FLCPX's -33.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.