PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXXVX vs. FLCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXXVX vs. FLCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthew 25 Fund (MXXVX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXXVX achieves a 5.05% return, which is significantly lower than FLCPX's 9.36% return. Over the past 10 years, MXXVX has underperformed FLCPX with an annualized return of 13.38%, while FLCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.00% annualized return.


MXXVX

1D
2.10%
1M
-2.19%
6M
3.85%
YTD
5.05%
1Y
16.82%
3Y*
18.86%
5Y*
9.82%
10Y*
13.38%
ALL TIME*
10.86%

FLCPX

1D
1.67%
1M
-0.57%
6M
7.78%
YTD
9.36%
1Y
20.62%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
12.70%
10Y*
15.00%
ALL TIME*
16.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MXXVX vs. FLCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXXVX
Matthew 25 Fund
5.05%18.64%27.41%36.76%-30.19%22.19%12.77%42.15%-19.39%24.69%
FLCPX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
9.36%17.84%25.08%26.25%-18.06%28.61%18.24%31.59%-4.38%21.74%

Correlation

The correlation between MXXVX and FLCPX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2016

0.83

The correlation between MXXVX and FLCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXXVX vs. FLCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MXXVX
MXXVX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
MXXVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXXVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXXVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
MXXVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXXVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCPX
FLCPX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FLCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MXXVX vs. FLCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthew 25 Fund (MXXVX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXXVXFLCPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.26

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

2.07

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.84

8.89

-5.05

MXXVX vs. FLCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXXVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the FLCPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXXVX and FLCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXXVX vs. FLCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXXVX drawdown since its inception was -96.53%, which is greater than FLCPX's maximum drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXXVX and FLCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXXVXFLCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.53%

-33.87%

-62.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.84%

-8.89%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-96.53%

-18.76%

-77.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.53%

-24.40%

-72.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.53%

-33.87%

-62.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.43%

-2.10%

-92.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.71%

-4.15%

-10.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

2.07%

+1.52%

Volatility

MXXVX vs. FLCPX - Volatility Comparison

Matthew 25 Fund (MXXVX) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) at 3.44%. This indicates that MXXVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXXVXFLCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.52%

3.44%

+2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.90%

10.08%

+5.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.70%

12.87%

+6.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

383.28%

17.18%

+366.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

271.33%

18.16%

+253.17%

MXXVX vs. FLCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXXVX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXXVX vs. FLCPX - Dividend Comparison

MXXVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.06%, more than FLCPX's 0.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCPX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
0.51%0.56%6.11%7.05%11.23%10.38%3.93%1.74%2.18%1.57%0.76%0.00%
MXXVX
Matthew 25 Fund
14.06%14.77%7.24%8.17%7.84%11.98%11.20%1.88%19.45%7.65%9.66%8.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXXVX and FLCPX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXXVX has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to FLCPX (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXXVX dropped -96.53% vs FLCPX's -33.87%.

FLCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXXVX and FLCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer