PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXXIX vs. CTIGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXXIX vs. CTIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Marsico Midcap Growth Focus Fund (MXXIX) and Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXXIX achieves a 18.28% return, which is significantly lower than CTIGX's 28.65% return.


MXXIX

1D
2.24%
1M
5.39%
YTD
18.28%
6M
15.93%
1Y
31.18%
3Y*
32.75%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
17.44%

CTIGX

1D
2.47%
1M
2.94%
YTD
28.65%
6M
24.09%
1Y
58.14%
3Y*
31.80%
5Y*
11.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXXIX vs. CTIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MXXIX
Marsico Midcap Growth Focus Fund
18.28%26.09%42.95%21.71%-31.84%12.04%45.34%0.30%
CTIGX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund
28.65%21.21%44.09%12.26%-34.88%7.64%58.94%-3.80%

Correlation

The correlation between MXXIX and CTIGX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2019

0.89

The correlation between MXXIX and CTIGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXXIX vs. CTIGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXXIX
MXXIX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MXXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MXXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

CTIGX
CTIGX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
CTIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
CTIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXXIX vs. CTIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marsico Midcap Growth Focus Fund (MXXIX) and Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXXIXCTIGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.35

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

5.02

-2.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.86

19.09

-10.23

MXXIX vs. CTIGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXXIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the CTIGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXXIX and CTIGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXXIX vs. CTIGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXXIX drawdown since its inception was -62.49%, which is greater than CTIGX's maximum drawdown of -46.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXXIX and CTIGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXXIXCTIGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.49%

-46.26%

-16.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.07%

-11.56%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.05%

-29.30%

+9.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.59%

-46.26%

+5.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.93%

+0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.33%

-18.49%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

3.03%

+0.43%

Volatility

MXXIX vs. CTIGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Marsico Midcap Growth Focus Fund (MXXIX) is 6.96%, while Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX) has a volatility of 10.51%. This indicates that MXXIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXXIXCTIGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

10.51%

-3.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.38%

21.94%

-5.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.11%

27.64%

-7.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.91%

27.26%

-4.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.88%

29.22%

-7.34%

MXXIX vs. CTIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXXIX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than CTIGX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXXIX vs. CTIGX - Dividend Comparison

MXXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.10%, more than CTIGX's 3.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CTIGX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund
3.57%4.59%2.80%0.00%0.00%11.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MXXIX
Marsico Midcap Growth Focus Fund
10.10%11.95%9.18%1.24%0.00%14.22%2.83%3.26%5.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXXIX and CTIGX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTIGX has higher volatility (10.51%) compared to MXXIX (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXXIX dropped -62.49% vs CTIGX's -46.26%.

CTIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXXIX and CTIGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer