MXWO.L vs. JEPG.L
MXWO.L (Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF) and JEPG.L (JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist) are both Global Equities funds. MXWO.L is passively managed, while JEPG.L is actively managed. Over the past year, MXWO.L returned 26.14% vs 0.74% for JEPG.L. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MXWO.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPG.L.
Performance
MXWO.L vs. JEPG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXWO.L achieves a 9.99% return, which is significantly higher than JEPG.L's -2.64% return.
MXWO.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 4.21%
- YTD
- 9.99%
- 6M
- 11.10%
- 1Y
- 26.14%
- 3Y*
- 20.86%
- 5Y*
- 11.92%
- 10Y*
- 13.12%
JEPG.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- -2.64%
- 6M
- -2.05%
- 1Y
- 0.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MXWO.L vs. JEPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MXWO.L Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF | 9.99% | 20.83% | 19.19% | 5.20% |
JEPG.L JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist | -2.64% | 12.39% | 7.83% | 1.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXWO.L and JEPG.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023 | 0.36 |
MXWO.L vs. JEPG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MXWO.L
JEPG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
MXWO.L
JEPG.L
Financial Services
MXWO.L
JEPG.L
Industrials
MXWO.L
JEPG.L
Consumer Cyclical
MXWO.L
JEPG.L
Communication Services
MXWO.L
JEPG.L
Healthcare
MXWO.L
JEPG.L
Consumer Defensive
MXWO.L
JEPG.L
Energy
MXWO.L
JEPG.L
Basic Materials
MXWO.L
JEPG.L
Utilities
MXWO.L
JEPG.L
Real Estate
MXWO.L
JEPG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXWO.L vs. JEPG.L — Risk / Return Rank
MXWO.L
JEPG.L
MXWO.L vs. JEPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF (MXWO.L) and JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist (JEPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXWO.L | JEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.02 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | 0.09 | +3.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.34 | 0.23 | +13.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXWO.L | JEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 0.08 | +2.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.69 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
MXWO.L vs. JEPG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXWO.L drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, which is greater than JEPG.L's maximum drawdown of -8.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXWO.L and JEPG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXWO.L | JEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -8.41% | -25.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -8.41% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -7.98% | +7.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.31% | -1.70% | -2.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 3.20% | -1.25% |
Volatility
MXWO.L vs. JEPG.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF (MXWO.L) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist (JEPG.L) at 2.69%. This indicates that MXWO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXWO.L | JEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.32% | 2.69% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.15% | 6.64% | +2.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.88% | 9.19% | +2.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.75% | 10.97% | +4.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.93% | 10.97% | +4.96% |
MXWO.L vs. JEPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXWO.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than JEPG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXWO.L vs. JEPG.L - Dividend Comparison
MXWO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JEPG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.88%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
JEPG.L JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist | 8.88% | 7.86% | 6.50% |
MXWO.L Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXWO.L and JEPG.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MXWO.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MXWO.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPG.L.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for MXWO.L and 0.35% for JEPG.L.
Find the right allocation for MXWO.L and JEPG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer