PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MXWO.L vs. IWFV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MXWO.L vs. IWFV.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MXWO.L (Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF) and IWFV.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - MXWO.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while IWFV.L tracks the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MXWO.L returned 13.12%/yr vs 12.86%/yr for IWFV.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MXWO.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IWFV.L.

Performance

MXWO.L vs. IWFV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF (MXWO.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IWFV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MXWO.L is traded in USD, while IWFV.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IWFV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXWO.L achieves a 9.99% return, which is significantly lower than IWFV.L's 34.19% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MXWO.L having a 13.12% annualized return and IWFV.L not far behind at 12.86%.

MXWO.L

1D
0.04%
1M
4.21%
YTD
9.99%
6M
11.10%
1Y
26.14%
3Y*
20.86%
5Y*
11.92%
10Y*
13.12%

IWFV.L

1D
-0.66%
1M
12.27%
YTD
34.19%
6M
38.30%
1Y
66.20%
3Y*
30.24%
5Y*
16.25%
10Y*
12.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXWO.L vs. IWFV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXWO.L
Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF		9.99%20.83%19.19%24.56%-18.08%22.12%16.27%27.41%-9.08%22.79%
IWFV.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF		34.19%40.55%5.07%18.98%-9.85%20.49%-4.06%19.29%-14.47%22.70%

Correlation

The correlation between MXWO.L and IWFV.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2014

0.81

The correlation between MXWO.L and IWFV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

MXWO.L vs. IWFV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MXWO.L
IWFV.L

Technology

28.3%
33.9%

Financial Services

15.7%
14.8%

Industrials

11.4%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
7.9%

Communication Services

9.3%
7.6%

Healthcare

8.8%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
4.5%

Energy

4.2%
3.8%

Basic Materials

3.3%
3.0%

Utilities

2.7%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.8%

Technology

MXWO.L
28.3%
IWFV.L
33.9%

Financial Services

MXWO.L
15.7%
IWFV.L
14.8%

Industrials

MXWO.L
11.4%
IWFV.L
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

MXWO.L
9.3%
IWFV.L
7.9%

Communication Services

MXWO.L
9.3%
IWFV.L
7.6%

Healthcare

MXWO.L
8.8%
IWFV.L
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

MXWO.L
5.2%
IWFV.L
4.5%

Energy

MXWO.L
4.2%
IWFV.L
3.8%

Basic Materials

MXWO.L
3.3%
IWFV.L
3.0%

Utilities

MXWO.L
2.7%
IWFV.L
2.5%

Real Estate

MXWO.L
1.9%
IWFV.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF

iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF

Often compared with MXWO.L:
MXWO.L vs. MXWS.LMXWO.L vs. SSAC.LMXWO.L vs. IWDA.LMXWO.L vs. URTHMXWO.L vs. VTMXWO.L vs. ^NDXMXWO.L vs. SPY5.L
Often compared with IWFV.L:
IWFV.L vs. OEFIWFV.L vs. VOOIWFV.L vs. IOOIWFV.L vs. IWQU.LIWFV.L vs. VWRA.LIWFV.L vs. SMGB.LIWFV.L vs. IWDA.L

Return for Risk

MXWO.L vs. IWFV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MXWO.L
MXWO.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
MXWO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXWO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXWO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
MXWO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXWO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
IWFV.L
IWFV.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IWFV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWFV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWFV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
IWFV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWFV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXWO.L vs. IWFV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF (MXWO.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IWFV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MXWO.LIWFV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.19
4.39

-2.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.26
6.02

-2.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.78

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

7.60

-4.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.34

29.04

-15.71

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MXWO.L vs. IWFV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXWO.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is lower than the IWFV.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXWO.L and IWFV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MXWO.LIWFV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

4.39

-2.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

1.03

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.76

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.62

+0.24

Drawdowns

MXWO.L vs. IWFV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXWO.L drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, smaller than the maximum IWFV.L drawdown of -39.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXWO.L and IWFV.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MXWO.LIWFV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.89%

-39.15%

+5.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-8.67%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.85%

-14.41%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.80%

-26.74%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.89%

-39.15%

+5.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.84%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.31%

-7.49%

+3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.27%

-0.32%

Volatility

MXWO.L vs. IWFV.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF (MXWO.L) is 3.32%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IWFV.L) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that MXWO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWFV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MXWO.LIWFV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

6.04%

-2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.15%

12.26%

-3.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.88%

14.99%

-3.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.75%

15.69%

+0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.93%

16.85%

-0.92%

MXWO.L vs. IWFV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXWO.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IWFV.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

MXWO.L vs. IWFV.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MXWO.L nor IWFV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

MXWO.L and IWFV.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MXWO.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MXWO.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IWFV.L.

MXWO.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while IWFV.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for MXWO.L and 0.30% for IWFV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXWO.L and IWFV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer