PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXVIX vs. RESGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXVIX vs. RESGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West S&P 500 Index Fund (MXVIX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXVIX achieves a 10.69% return, which is significantly lower than RESGX's 27.23% return. Over the past 10 years, MXVIX has outperformed RESGX with an annualized return of 14.62%, while RESGX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.11% annualized return.


MXVIX

1D
-0.73%
1M
4.13%
YTD
10.69%
6M
10.55%
1Y
27.43%
3Y*
21.82%
5Y*
13.35%
10Y*
14.62%

RESGX

1D
-0.44%
1M
7.85%
YTD
27.23%
6M
27.44%
1Y
43.13%
3Y*
20.24%
5Y*
10.15%
10Y*
13.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXVIX vs. RESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXVIX
Great-West S&P 500 Index Fund
10.69%17.30%24.31%25.57%-18.56%29.04%16.96%30.84%-5.32%21.05%
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
27.23%10.30%11.40%15.59%-14.71%26.58%9.57%24.25%-6.47%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MXVIX and RESGX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between MXVIX and RESGX has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXVIX vs. RESGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXVIX
MXVIX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
MXVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MXVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

RESGX
RESGX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
RESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
RESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
RESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXVIX vs. RESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West S&P 500 Index Fund (MXVIX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXVIXRESGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.53

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

5.63

-2.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.79

20.42

-5.63

MXVIX vs. RESGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXVIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the RESGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXVIX and RESGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXVIXRESGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

3.07

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.59

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.70

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.71

-0.23

Drawdowns

MXVIX vs. RESGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXVIX drawdown since its inception was -58.12%, which is greater than RESGX's maximum drawdown of -37.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXVIX and RESGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXVIXRESGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.12%

-37.80%

-20.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-7.84%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.07%

-20.50%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.74%

-23.58%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.82%

-37.80%

+3.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.44%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.68%

-5.00%

-3.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

2.15%

-0.23%

Volatility

MXVIX vs. RESGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West S&P 500 Index Fund (MXVIX) is 2.92%, while Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that MXVIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RESGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXVIXRESGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

5.41%

-2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.99%

11.02%

-2.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.81%

14.42%

-2.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.19%

17.26%

-0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.21%

18.71%

-0.50%

MXVIX vs. RESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXVIX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than RESGX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXVIX vs. RESGX - Dividend Comparison

MXVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than RESGX's 6.55% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MXVIX
Great-West S&P 500 Index Fund
0.34%0.38%0.95%5.22%1.25%4.97%8.27%5.11%10.56%2.06%0.00%
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
6.55%8.24%13.38%9.08%8.17%9.98%0.82%1.90%5.09%0.94%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXVIX and RESGX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RESGX has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to MXVIX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXVIX dropped -58.12% vs RESGX's -37.80%.

RESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXVIX and RESGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer