PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXVIX vs. QCELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXVIX vs. QCELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West S&P 500 Index Fund (MXVIX) and AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXVIX achieves a 11.51% return, which is significantly lower than QCELX's 18.09% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MXVIX having a 14.71% annualized return and QCELX not far ahead at 15.20%.


MXVIX

1D
0.12%
1M
5.76%
YTD
11.51%
6M
11.50%
1Y
28.38%
3Y*
22.12%
5Y*
13.71%
10Y*
14.71%

QCELX

1D
-0.25%
1M
6.79%
YTD
18.09%
6M
19.95%
1Y
38.37%
3Y*
27.48%
5Y*
16.17%
10Y*
15.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXVIX vs. QCELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXVIX
Great-West S&P 500 Index Fund
11.51%17.30%24.31%25.57%-18.56%29.04%16.96%30.84%-5.32%21.05%
QCELX
AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund
18.09%23.38%22.73%26.30%-15.73%27.18%14.93%24.33%-10.96%22.73%

Correlation

The correlation between MXVIX and QCELX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.91

The correlation between MXVIX and QCELX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXVIX vs. QCELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXVIX
MXVIX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
MXVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
MXVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

QCELX
QCELX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QCELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCELX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QCELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCELX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXVIX vs. QCELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West S&P 500 Index Fund (MXVIX) and AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXVIXQCELXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.60

3.11

-0.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.53

4.21

-0.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.55

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

5.00

-1.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.71

23.00

-7.28

MXVIX vs. QCELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXVIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the QCELX Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXVIX and QCELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXVIXQCELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

3.11

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.86

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.80

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.72

-0.24

Drawdowns

MXVIX vs. QCELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXVIX drawdown since its inception was -58.12%, which is greater than QCELX's maximum drawdown of -33.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXVIX and QCELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXVIXQCELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.12%

-33.52%

-24.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-7.92%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.07%

-18.38%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.74%

-28.70%

+3.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.82%

-33.52%

-0.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.25%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.68%

-5.66%

-3.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.72%

+0.20%

Volatility

MXVIX vs. QCELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West S&P 500 Index Fund (MXVIX) is 2.82%, while AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX) has a volatility of 3.06%. This indicates that MXVIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXVIXQCELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

3.06%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.97%

9.34%

-0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.78%

12.75%

-0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.18%

18.93%

-1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.21%

18.97%

-0.76%

MXVIX vs. QCELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXVIX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than QCELX's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXVIX vs. QCELX - Dividend Comparison

MXVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than QCELX's 12.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MXVIX
Great-West S&P 500 Index Fund
0.34%0.38%0.95%5.22%1.25%4.97%8.27%5.11%10.56%2.06%0.00%0.00%
QCELX
AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund
12.19%14.40%12.89%13.67%11.05%12.41%9.94%5.36%7.81%0.99%1.28%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXVIX and QCELX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QCELX has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to MXVIX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXVIX dropped -58.12% vs QCELX's -33.52%.

QCELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXVIX and QCELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer